• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术有无腹膜后隧道的手术效果比较。

Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy with or without Retroperitoneal Tunneling.

作者信息

Lai Pei-Hsuan, Tsui Wing Lam, Ding Dah-Ching

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation, and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. (Drs. Lai, Tsui, and Ding).

Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. (Dr. Ding).

出版信息

JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00055. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2024.00055
PMID:40303441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12039164/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the retroperitoneal tunneling technique on the surgical time and outcomes of laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy (SHP) for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center cohort study in a tertiary referral center. Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic SHP for apical prolapse between 2016 and 2023. Laparoscopic SHP with or without right pelvic side wall retroperitoneal tunneling. The primary outcome was surgical time. Secondary outcomes included blood loss, intra-and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scores, and improvement in POP quantification (POP-Q) scores. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests and multiple regression. Statistical significance was set at  < .05.

RESULTS

The tunneling group (n = 14) demonstrated significantly shorter surgical times than the nontunneling (n = 18) group (60.79 ± 22.35 minutes vs 98.06 ± 26.28 minutes,  < .001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding blood loss, intra-and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, pain scores, or point-C positions during 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. Multiple regression analysis confirmed a significant reduction in surgical time in the tunneling group after adjusting for confounders (-62.36 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI) = -102.7, -21.99,  = .0038]).

CONCLUSION

The retroperitoneal tunneling technique in laparoscopic SHP significantly reduces the surgical time without increasing the risk of complications. These findings suggest that tunneling is a safe and efficient method that can be routinely adopted for SHP.

摘要

背景与目的

评估腹膜后隧道技术对腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(SHP)治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的手术时间及疗效的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项在三级转诊中心进行的回顾性单中心队列研究。2016年至2023年间,32例连续性患者因顶端脱垂接受了腹腔镜SHP。采用有或无右盆腔侧壁腹膜后隧道的腹腔镜SHP。主要结局指标为手术时间。次要结局指标包括失血量、术中和术后并发症、住院时间、术后疼痛评分以及POP量化(POP-Q)评分的改善情况。采用t检验和多元回归进行统计分析。设定统计学显著性水平为<0.05。

结果

隧道组(n = 14)的手术时间显著短于非隧道组(n = 18)(60.79 ± 22.35分钟 vs 98.06 ± 26.28分钟,<0.001)。两组在失血量、术中和术后并发症、住院时间、疼痛评分或随访3个月和1年时的C点位置方面无显著差异。多元回归分析证实,在调整混杂因素后,隧道组的手术时间显著缩短(-62.36分钟[95%置信区间(CI)= -102.7,-21.99,P = 0.0038])。

结论

腹腔镜SHP中的腹膜后隧道技术可显著缩短手术时间,且不增加并发症风险。这些发现表明,隧道技术是一种安全有效的方法,可常规应用于SHP。

相似文献

1
Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy with or without Retroperitoneal Tunneling.腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术有无腹膜后隧道的手术效果比较。
JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00055. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂妇女的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2.
3
Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.针对患有或未患有压力性尿失禁的盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013108.
4
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.
5
Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse.针对后盆腔脏器脱垂女性的手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 5;3(3):CD012975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012975.
6
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub4.
7
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
8
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
9
Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腔与经腹膜后腹腔镜肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):611-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11598.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
10
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂女性的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 1;10(10):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.

本文引用的文献

1
Literature review, surgical decision making algorithm, and AGREE II-S comparison of national and international recommendations and guidelines in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.文献回顾、手术决策算法,以及对国内外盆腔器官脱垂手术相关建议和指南的 AGREE II-S 比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;167(2):560-572. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15614. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and the Technique Used for Uterine Preservation: A Case Report.腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂及子宫保留技术:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54989. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Pelvic organ prolapse: Women's experiences of Accessing Care & Recommendations for improvement.盆腔器官脱垂:女性寻求治疗的经历及改进建议。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02832-z.
4
Sacrocolpopexy after sub-total hysterectomy vs. sacral hysteropexy for advanced urogenital prolapse: A propensity-matched study.次全子宫切除术后骶骨阴道固定术与骶骨阴道固定术治疗中重度尿生殖系统脱垂的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;163(3):847-853. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14959. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Association between vaginal or cesarean delivery and later development of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective population-based cohort study.阴道分娩或剖宫产与压力性尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂的后续发展之间的关联:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2041-2047. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05504-6. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Summary: 2021 International Consultation on Incontinence Evidence-Based Surgical Pathway for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.摘要:2021年盆腔器官脱垂基于循证的手术路径国际咨询会
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 17;11(20):6106. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206106.
7
Possible Association of Hysterectomy Accompanied with Opportunistic Salpingectomy with Early Menopause: A Retrospective Cohort Study.子宫切除术伴随机输卵管切除术与早绝经的可能关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911871.
8
Creation of retroperitoneal tunnel in robot-assisted sacrohysteropexy.机器人辅助骶骨子宫固定术中腹膜后隧道的创建
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):909. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.052. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
9
External Exposure to BTEX, Internal Biomarker Response, and Health Risk Assessment of Nonoccupational Populations near a Coking Plant in Southwest China.中国西南某炼焦厂附近非职业人群的 BTEX 外暴露、内生物标志物反应及健康风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020847.
10
Sacrocolpopexy tends to be superior to transvaginal mesh surgery.骶骨阴道固定术往往优于经阴道网片手术。
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):24. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16407. Epub 2020 Aug 3.