• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水下与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大肠腺瘤的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。

Comparing underwater and conventional cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Fu Biao, Zhou Xiangrong, Xiaofeng Tian, Du Zhi Qiang, Wang Fei, Xu Da Hai, Yue Wang, Jin Wang, Liu Wei-Hui

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Jianyang People's Hospital, Jianyang, Chengdu, China.

Department of Internal Medicine I, Jianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jianyang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 8;13:a25490922. doi: 10.1055/a-2549-0922. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1055/a-2549-0922
PMID:40304004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12039949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

In this study, we aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP) for treating colorectal adenoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial screened patients with colorectal adenomas measuring 4 to 9 mm in diameter that were identified through colonoscopies at the Department of Gastroenterology in Jianyang People's Hospital between April 2022 and October 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo UCSP or cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Both groups underwent narrow-band imaging to determine international colorectal endoscopic morphology of type 2 noncancerous lesions. Following polyp removal, biopsy specimens were collected from the base and margins to assess the completeness of resection.

RESULTS

The study included 227 polyps from 172 patients; median sizes in the UCSP (n = 122) and CSP groups (n=105) were 5 mm and 6 mm, respectively. The R0 (96.7% vs. 86.7%; =0.005) and muscularis mucosa resection rates (68.9% vs. 43.8%; <0.0001) were significantly higher in the UCSP group than in the CSP group. However, operative time for the UCSP group (109.5 s; 86.8-134.3 vs. 110.0 s; 83.5-143.5 =0.890) was not significantly longer than that for the CSP group. Neither group exhibited delayed bleeding or perforations.

CONCLUSIONS

UCSP has a high R0 rate for colorectal adenomas measuring 4 to 9 mm.

摘要

背景与研究目的

在本研究中,我们旨在评估水下冷圈套息肉切除术(UCSP)治疗大肠腺瘤的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

这项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验筛选了2022年4月至2023年10月间在建阳市人民医院胃肠科通过结肠镜检查发现的直径为4至9毫米的大肠腺瘤患者。患者被随机分配接受UCSP或冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)。两组均进行窄带成像以确定2型非癌性病变的国际结直肠内镜形态。息肉切除后,从基底和边缘采集活检标本以评估切除的完整性。

结果

该研究纳入了172例患者的227枚息肉;UCSP组(n = 122)和CSP组(n = 105)的息肉中位大小分别为5毫米和6毫米。UCSP组的R0切除率(96.7%对86.7%;P = 0.005)和黏膜肌层切除率(68.9%对43.8%;P < 0.0001)显著高于CSP组。然而,UCSP组的手术时间(109.5秒;86.8 - 134.3对110.0秒;83.5 - 143.5;P = 0.890)并不显著长于CSP组。两组均未出现延迟出血或穿孔。

结论

对于直径4至9毫米的大肠腺瘤,UCSP具有较高的R0切除率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28fa/12039949/ea5cb93af9fd/10-1055-a-2549-0922_25499802.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28fa/12039949/16341aea1ebe/10-1055-a-2549-0922_25499801.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28fa/12039949/ea5cb93af9fd/10-1055-a-2549-0922_25499802.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28fa/12039949/16341aea1ebe/10-1055-a-2549-0922_25499801.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28fa/12039949/ea5cb93af9fd/10-1055-a-2549-0922_25499802.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing underwater and conventional cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas: Prospective randomized controlled trial.水下与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大肠腺瘤的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 8;13:a25490922. doi: 10.1055/a-2549-0922. eCollection 2025.
2
Underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas.经内镜冷圈套切除术治疗结直肠腺瘤。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Nov;31(6):662-671. doi: 10.1111/den.13427. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience.冷水随机对照试验结果:水下冷圈套息肉切除术对5-10毫米大肠息肉的切除效果更佳,与内镜医师经验无关。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):466-475. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0889. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
4
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Underwater versus conventional cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in diameter: a prospective randomized controlled trial.直径 4-9 毫米的结直肠息肉经水下与传统冷圈套切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6527-6534. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09013-3. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.一项关于使用窄带成像内镜进行冷活检钳息肉切除术与冷圈套息肉切除术治疗微小结直肠息肉患者的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):527-32.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.053. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study).比较水下冷圈套息肉切除术与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗直径5-10毫米无蒂结肠息肉的随机临床试验方案设计(COLDWATER研究)
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;27(4):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02731-9. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
8
Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷活检钳息肉切除术联合双活检技术用于切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
9
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
10
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3789-3795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09875-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Submucosal Saline Injection During Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Sized 3-9 mm: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.黏膜下生理盐水注射在 3-9mm 大小结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术的应用效果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1848-1854. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002329. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套切除术与热圈套切除术治疗结直肠小息肉内镜下切除的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 19;38(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2.
3
Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项实用随机对照试验
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar;176(3):311-319. doi: 10.7326/M22-2189. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Endoscopic features and clinical course of colorectal carcinoma resected by cold snare polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术切除的结直肠癌的内镜特征和临床过程。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;38(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16145. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
5
Resection depth for small colorectal polyps comparing cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.比较冷圈套息肉切除术、热圈套息肉切除术和水下内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉的切除深度。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E602-E608. doi: 10.1055/a-1785-8616. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Efficacy of specimen pasting after cold snare polypectomy for pathological evaluation of horizontal margins.冷圈套息肉切除术后标本粘贴用于水平切缘病理评估的疗效
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E572-E579. doi: 10.1055/a-1784-6723. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗大型无蒂或平坦状结直肠息肉:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Gastroenterology. 2021 Nov;161(5):1460-1474.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.044. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
8
Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗小(5 - 9毫米)结直肠息肉的疗效与安全性:一项多中心随机对照试验
Endoscopy. 2022 Jan;54(1):35-44. doi: 10.1055/a-1327-8357. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.水下与传统 EMR 治疗结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Feb;93(2):378-389. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Histopathologic features and fragmentation of polyps with cold snare defect protrusions.冷圈套缺陷突出的息肉的组织病理学特征和碎片。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Jul 27.