• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经内镜冷圈套切除术治疗结直肠腺瘤。

Underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Translational Research and Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2019 Nov;31(6):662-671. doi: 10.1111/den.13427. Epub 2019 May 27.

DOI:10.1111/den.13427
PMID:31038769
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe treatment for colorectal adenomas. However, the R0 resection rate is not sufficiently high because of inadequate resection of muscularis mucosa. We hypothesized that CSP in an underwater environment could improve this procedure by helping to safely achieve resection containing the muscularis mucosa. We have named this procedure underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of UCSP for colorectal adenomas.

METHODS

Between May 2017 and April 2018, patients diagnosed with colorectal adenomas <9 mm underwent UCSP. After follow-up colonoscopy 3 weeks later, the patients post-UCSP scars were biopsied. Outcomes were compared with those of a historical control group who underwent conventional CSP in our previous study using propensity score-matching methods.

RESULTS

Overall, 224 lesions in 65 patients were prospectively resected by UCSP. Pathologically, 209 lesions were adenomas (4.5 ± 1.5 mm) including one intramucosal carcinoma. Only one pathological residual adenoma was identified, but there was no significant difference in the residual rate between the UCSP and CSP groups (both 1.0%). No complications were observed. R0 resection rate and rate of area containing the muscularis mucosa in the UCSP group were significantly higher than those in the CSP group (80.2% vs 32.7%, P < 0.001; 50.0% vs 35.3%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Underwater cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal adenomas was safe and effective from the perspective of pathological complete resection, which is likely facilitated by achieving an adequate depth of resection.

摘要

背景与目的

冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)是一种安全的结直肠腺瘤治疗方法。然而,由于黏膜肌层切除不足,R0 切除率不够高。我们假设水下环境中的 CSP 可以通过帮助安全地实现包含黏膜肌层的切除来改善该过程。我们将此过程命名为水下冷圈套息肉切除术(UCSP)。我们旨在研究 UCSP 治疗结直肠腺瘤的疗效和安全性。

方法

2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 4 月,对诊断为 <9mm 的结直肠腺瘤患者行 UCSP。3 周后行随访结肠镜检查,对 UCSP 后患者的疤痕进行活检。采用倾向评分匹配方法,将这些结果与我们之前研究中采用传统 CSP 的历史对照组进行比较。

结果

共有 65 例患者的 224 处病变被前瞻性地采用 UCSP 切除。病理上,209 处病变为腺瘤(4.5±1.5mm),其中 1 处为黏膜内癌。仅发现 1 处病理残留腺瘤,但 UCSP 和 CSP 组的残留率无显著差异(均为 1.0%)。未观察到并发症。UCSP 组的 R0 切除率和包含黏膜肌层的区域率明显高于 CSP 组(80.2%比 32.7%,P<0.001;50.0%比 35.3%,P=0.015)。

结论

从病理完全切除的角度来看,UCSP 治疗小尺寸结直肠腺瘤是安全有效的,这可能是由于实现了足够的切除深度。

相似文献

1
Underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas.经内镜冷圈套切除术治疗结直肠腺瘤。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Nov;31(6):662-671. doi: 10.1111/den.13427. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
Residual adenoma after cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal adenomas: a prospective clinical study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小结直肠腺瘤后残留腺瘤:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Endoscopy. 2018 Jul;50(7):693-700. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124869. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
3
Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience.冷水随机对照试验结果:水下冷圈套息肉切除术对5-10毫米大肠息肉的切除效果更佳,与内镜医师经验无关。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):466-475. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0889. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
4
Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.微小结直肠息肉的切除:冷圈套息肉切除术与热活检钳活检的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):328-335. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328.
5
Cold polypectomy for duodenal adenomas: a prospective clinical trial.冷切除法治疗十二指肠腺瘤:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Endoscopy. 2017 Aug;49(8):776-783. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-107028. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷活检钳息肉切除术联合双活检技术用于切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
7
Resection rates and safety profile of cold vs. hot snare polypectomy in polyps sized 5-10 mm and 11-20 mm.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗 5-10mm 和 11-20mm 大小息肉的切除率和安全性分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Apr;51(4):536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate.冷圈套与冷活检钳切除小腺瘤对节段性不完全切除率的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 1;118(8):1410-1418. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002289. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.一项比较巨检活检钳与冷圈套切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1206-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06874-z. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Underwater versus conventional cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in diameter: a prospective randomized controlled trial.直径 4-9 毫米的结直肠息肉经水下与传统冷圈套切除术的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6527-6534. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09013-3. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing underwater and conventional cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas: Prospective randomized controlled trial.水下与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大肠腺瘤的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 8;13:a25490922. doi: 10.1055/a-2549-0922. eCollection 2025.
2
Cold Snare Polypectomy in Pediatric Polyposis: A Multicenter Experience.儿童息肉病的冷圈套息肉切除术:多中心经验
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;12(3):291. doi: 10.3390/children12030291.
3
Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp.
冷圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠息肉时边缘不清的危险因素。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):1404-1409. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002845. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
Underwater modified strip biopsy for colorectal polyp invading into the appendiceal orifice.水下改良条形活检术用于侵犯阑尾开口的大肠息肉
VideoGIE. 2024 Mar 26;9(7):344-347. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.03.013. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience.冷水随机对照试验结果:水下冷圈套息肉切除术对5-10毫米大肠息肉的切除效果更佳,与内镜医师经验无关。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):466-475. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0889. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
6
Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis.小的结直肠息肉的不同内镜治疗方法:一项系统评价、成对比较和网状Meta分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 6;10:1154411. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1154411. eCollection 2023.
7
Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study).比较水下冷圈套息肉切除术与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗直径5-10毫米无蒂结肠息肉的随机临床试验方案设计(COLDWATER研究)
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;27(4):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02731-9. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
8
Effect of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大肠小息肉的效果
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jul 6;10(19):6446-6455. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i19.6446.