Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病中的胰岛素抵抗是血小板高反应性的关键调节因素。

Insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes is a key modulator of platelet hyperreactivity.

作者信息

Sagar Rebecca C, Yates Daisie M, Pearson Sam M, Kietsiriroje Noppadol, Hindle Matthew S, Cheah Lih T, Webb Beth A, Ajjan Ramzi A, Naseem Khalid M

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06429-z.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in the presence of insulin resistance. A prothrombotic environment is believed to contribute to this risk but thrombotic pathways in type 1 diabetes are only partially understood and the role of platelets is incompletely studied. We hypothesised that platelets from individuals with type 1 diabetes exhibit platelet hyperactivity due to both increased propensity for activation and diminished sensitivity to inhibition, with an amplified maladaptive phenotype in those with insulin resistance.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from individuals with type 1 diabetes enrolled on the 'Double diabEtes and adVErse cLinical Outcome: identification of mechanistic Pathways' (DEVELOP) study with insulin resistance assessed as estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), whereby eGDR >8 or <6 mg kg min indicates normal insulin sensitivity or advanced insulin resistance, respectively. Platelet function was analysed using whole blood multiparameter flow cytometry to simultaneously measure three distinct markers of activation, including integrin αβ (PAC-1 binding), P-selectin (CD62P) and phosphatidylserine (PS) (Annexin V). Both activation and inhibition responses of the platelets were investigated, which were subjected to the machine learning tool Full Annotation Shape-constrained Trees (FAUST) to characterise platelet subpopulations.

RESULTS

A total of 32 individuals with type 1 diabetes were studied (median age [range] of 24 [18-34] years, 59% male, diabetes duration [mean ± SD] of 14.0 ± 6.3 years and HbA of 65.3 ± 14.0 mmol/mol [8.1%]). An increased basal expression, measured as mean fluorescence intensity, of all three platelet activation markers was detected in the type 1 diabetes group compared with healthy control participants (CD62P expression 521 ± 246 vs 335 ± 67; p<0.001, PAC-1 370 ± 165 vs 231 ± 88; p=0.011 and PS 869 ± 762 vs 294 ± 109; p=0.001). Following platelet stimulation, an enhanced activation of these markers was found in the type 1 diabetes group. Within the type 1 diabetes group, those with advanced insulin resistance (eGDR<6 mg kg min) showed increased platelet activation compared with individuals with normal insulin sensitivity (eGDR>8 mg kg min) with single agonist stimulation CD62P expression (29,167 ± 2177 vs 22,829 ± 2535, p<0.001 and PAC-1 19,339 ± 11,749 and 5187 ± 2872, p=0.02). Moreover, individuals with type 1 diabetes showed reduced sensitivity to platelet inhibition by prostacyclin (PGI) compared with control participants. Stratification of individuals with type 1 diabetes by insulin resistance demonstrated that in the presence of PGI, suppression of stimulated CD62P was 17 ± 11% and 33 ± 12% (p=0.02) for advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, respectively, with even larger differences demonstrated for PAC-1 (48 ± 17% and 75 ± 7%; p=0.006) and PS exposure (33 ± 12% and 84 ± 10%; p=0.001). Furthermore, FAUST analysis showed that, under basal conditions, there was a different distribution of the eight platelet subpopulations comparing advanced insulin resistance and normal insulin sensitivity groups, with differences also detected following PGI inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our novel characterisation of platelets in type 1 diabetes shows a maladaptive phenotype with increased basal activity together with hyperactivation following stimulation and diminished responses to inhibition. Insulin resistance appears to further drive this adverse thrombotic phenotype, suggesting an enhanced platelet-driven cardiovascular risk in those with type 1 diabetes and reduced insulin sensitivity.

摘要

目的/假设:1型糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险增加,尤其是存在胰岛素抵抗时。促血栓形成环境被认为是导致这种风险的原因之一,但1型糖尿病的血栓形成途径仅部分为人所知,血小板的作用也未得到充分研究。我们假设,1型糖尿病患者的血小板表现出血小板活性亢进,这是由于激活倾向增加和对抑制的敏感性降低所致,在存在胰岛素抵抗的患者中,这种不良适应表型会进一步放大。

方法

从参与“双糖尿病与不良临床结局:机制途径识别”(DEVELOP)研究的1型糖尿病患者中采集血样,胰岛素抵抗通过估计的葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)进行评估,其中eGDR>8或<6mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹分别表示正常胰岛素敏感性或严重胰岛素抵抗。使用全血多参数流式细胞术分析血小板功能,同时测量三种不同的激活标志物,包括整合素αβ(PAC-1结合)、P-选择素(CD62P)和磷脂酰丝氨酸(PS)(膜联蛋白V)。研究了血小板的激活和抑制反应,并使用机器学习工具全注释形状约束树(FAUST)对血小板亚群进行表征。

结果

共研究了32例1型糖尿病患者(中位年龄[范围]为24型糖尿病组所有三种血小板激活标志物的基础表达(以平均荧光强度衡量)均高于健康对照参与者(CD62P表达521±246对335±67;p<0.001,PAC-1 370±165对231±88;p=0.011,PS869±762对294±109;p=0.001)。血小板刺激后,1型糖尿病组这些标志物的激活增强。在1型糖尿病组中,严重胰岛素抵抗(eGDR<6mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)的患者与正常胰岛素敏感性(eGDR>8mg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)的患者相比,单激动剂刺激下血小板激活增加(CD62P表达29,167±2177对22,829±2535,p<0.001,PAC-1 19,339±11,749和5187±2872,p=图02)。此外,与对照参与者相比,1型糖尿病患者对前列环素(PGI)抑制血小板的敏感性降低。根据胰岛素抵抗对1型糖尿病患者进行分层显示,在PGI存在的情况下,严重胰岛素抵抗组和正常胰岛素敏感性组刺激后CD62P的抑制率分别为17±11%和33±12%(p=0.02),PAC-1(48±17%和75±7%;p=0.006)和PS暴露(33±12%和84±10%;p=0.001)的差异更大。此外,FAUST分析表明,在基础条件下,严重胰岛素抵抗组和正常胰岛素敏感性组的八个血小板亚群分布不同,PGI抑制后也检测到差异。

结论/解读:我们对1型糖尿病患者血小板的新表征显示出一种不良适应表型,基础活性增加,刺激后过度激活,对抑制的反应减弱。胰岛素抵抗似乎进一步加剧了这种不良血栓形成表型,提示1型糖尿病且胰岛素敏感性降低的患者血小板驱动的心血管疾病风险增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验