Wang Ni, Chen Xiao
Department of Neurology, Chongqing Jiulongpo People's Hospital, Chongqing, 400050, China.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01223-x.
The study aims to explore the diagnostic value of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) combined with olfactory tests for identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This prospective study enrolled older adult T2DM patients from Jiulongpo District People's Hospital, Chongqing, China, between August 2018 and January 2023. Diagnostic criteria proposed by Petersen served as the gold standard for MCI. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), MoCA, and olfactory assessments were employed to evaluate cognitive function.
A total of 192 patients were included, of which 94 (49.0%) were diagnosed with MCI (68.5 ± 5.5 years; 31.9% male) and 98 (51.0%) with normal cognitive function (NMCI) (68.4 ± 4.9 years; 45.9% male). Compared to the NMCI group, the MCI group showed significant differences in MMSE (25.6 ± 2.5 vs. 28.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.001), MoCA (20.7 ± 2.5 vs. 26.3 ± 2.4, P < 0.001), olfactory (23.9 ± 7.2 vs. 26.4 ± 8.4, P = 0.027), and olfactory impairment degree (P = 0.004). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the olfactory test was 0.620 (95%CI: 0.541-0.699), for MMSE 0.838 (95%CI: 0.779-0.897), and for MoCA 0.948 (95%CI: 0.918-0.977). For the combination of MoCA with olfactory tests, the AUC of the parallel test was 0.955 (95%CI: 0.929-0.982).
The MoCA scale is an effective screening tool for MCI in T2DM patients. Additionally, the combination of MoCA and olfactory testing is superior to MoCA alone in identifying MCI in T2DM patients. This combination approach offers a promising diagnostic tool for MCI in T2DM patients.
本研究旨在探讨蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)联合嗅觉测试对老年2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者轻度认知障碍(MCI)的诊断价值。
本前瞻性研究纳入了2018年8月至2023年1月期间来自中国重庆九龙坡区人民医院的老年T2DM患者。彼得森提出的诊断标准作为MCI的金标准。采用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、MoCA和嗅觉评估来评估认知功能。
共纳入192例患者,其中94例(49.0%)被诊断为MCI(年龄68.5±5.5岁;男性占31.9%),98例(51.0%)认知功能正常(非MCI,NMCI)(年龄68.4±4.9岁;男性占45.9%)。与NMCI组相比,MCI组在MMSE(25.6±2.5 vs. 28.7±1.3,P<0.001)、MoCA(20.7±2.5 vs. 26.3±2.4,P<0.001)、嗅觉(23.9±7.2 vs. 26.4±8.4,P=0.027)及嗅觉障碍程度(P=0.004)方面存在显著差异。嗅觉测试的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.620(95%CI:0.541-0.699),MMSE为0.838(95%CI:0.779-0.897),MoCA为0.948(95%CI:0.918-0.977)。对于MoCA与嗅觉测试的联合,平行测试的AUC为0.955(95%CI:0.929-0.982)。
MoCA量表是T2DM患者MCI的有效筛查工具。此外,MoCA与嗅觉测试相结合在识别T2DM患者的MCI方面优于单独使用MoCA。这种联合方法为T2DM患者的MCI提供了一种有前景的诊断工具。