Hurtado-Olmo Patricia, González-Santos Ángela, Iruela Laura Del Olmo, Castro-Ropero Belén, Zúñiga-Gómez Lourdes, Bueno-García Ana Isabel, Guijosa-Campos Pilar, Gómez-Pozo Basilio, Hita-Contreras Fidel, Hernández-Cortés Pedro
Upper Limb Surgery Unit, Orthopedic Surgery Department, San Cecilio University Hospital of Granada, Spain.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0322588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322588. eCollection 2025.
Stroke is the principal cause of permanent disability in adult age, and many patients require lifelong medical treatment and care from others for their daily activities. It has enormous repercussions on the work and social lives of patients and their families and involves major economic expenditure. Post-stroke spastic upper limb is usually treated with rehabilitation, occupational therapy, and periodical injections of botulinum toxin, while surgical correction is now seldom considered. However, there has been no clinical trial to compare between surgical and toxin treatments. The primary aim of this study is to compare outcomes between surgery and a conventional approach with botulinum toxin in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity.
A two-arm (surgical treatment [n = 22] vs. botulinum toxin [n = 22]) randomized clinical trial (RCT) will be performed to compare the efficacy of surgery with that of botulinum toxin treatment in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Data will be collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up on functionality, hygienic status, quality of life, sleep quality, anxiety/depression levels, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-measured brain activity. Healthcare and care costs will be compared between the groups.
This research is set in the context of chronic diseases, aging, and functional/mobility limitations. The results can be expected to have a major impact, because the high prevalence of stroke and the severe associated disability means that an enormous number of patients can benefit from improved treatment protocols, and a more rational use of resources would yield considerable economic benefits for health and care systems. Our expectation is that outcomes would be more favorable with surgery. However, the aim is not to exclude any approach but rather to explore how the potential and indications of each treatment could be integrated within a multidisciplinary therapeutic protocol in a complementary manner. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06392633). Registered on 30 April 2024.
中风是成年人永久性残疾的主要原因,许多患者在日常生活中需要终身医疗治疗和他人照顾。这对患者及其家庭的工作和社会生活产生了巨大影响,并涉及重大经济支出。中风后上肢痉挛通常采用康复、职业治疗和定期注射肉毒杆菌毒素进行治疗,而现在很少考虑手术矫正。然而,尚未有临床试验比较手术治疗和毒素治疗的效果。本研究的主要目的是比较中风后上肢痉挛患者手术治疗与传统肉毒杆菌毒素治疗方法的疗效。
将进行一项双臂(手术治疗[n = 22]与肉毒杆菌毒素治疗[n = 22])随机临床试验(RCT),以比较中风后上肢痉挛患者手术治疗与肉毒杆菌毒素治疗的疗效。将在基线以及随访6个月和12个月时收集有关功能、卫生状况、生活质量、睡眠质量、焦虑/抑郁水平以及功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量的大脑活动的数据。将比较两组之间的医疗保健和护理成本。
本研究是在慢性病、老龄化以及功能/行动能力受限的背景下进行的。预计结果将产生重大影响,因为中风的高患病率和严重的相关残疾意味着大量患者可以从改进的治疗方案中受益,更合理地使用资源将为卫生和护理系统带来可观的经济效益。我们预计手术治疗的结果会更有利。然而,目的不是排除任何一种方法,而是探索如何以互补的方式将每种治疗的潜力和适应症整合到多学科治疗方案中。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT06392633)。于2024年4月30日注册。