Department of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Jul;11(7). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006994.
Single-agent PD-(L)1 blockade (IO) alone or in combination with chemotherapy (Chemotherapy-IO) is approved first-line therapies in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. These regimens have not been compared prospectively. The primary objective was to compare first-line efficacies of single-agent IO to Chemotherapy-IO in patients with advanced LUADs. Secondary objectives were to explore if clinical, pathological, and genomic features were associated with differential response to Chemotherapy-IO versus IO.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were patients with advanced LUADs with tumor PD-L1 ≥1% treated with first-line Chemotherapy-IO or IO. To compare the first-line efficacies of single-agent IO to Chemotherapy-IO, we conducted inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards models using estimated propensity scores.
The cohort analyzed included 866 patients. Relative to IO, Chemotherapy-IO was associated with improved objective response rate (ORR) (44% vs 35%, p=0.007) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumor PD-L1≥1% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97, p=0.021) or PD-L1≥50% (ORR 55% vs 38%, p<0.001; PFS HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87, p=0.002). Using propensity-adjusted analyses, only never-smokers in the PD-L1≥50% subgroup derived a differential survival benefit from Chemotherapy-IO vs IO (p=0.013). Among patients with very high tumor PD-L1 expression (≥90%), there were no differences in outcome between treatment groups. No genomic factors conferred differential survival benefit to Chemotherapy-IO versus IO.
While the addition of chemotherapy to PD-(L)1 blockade increases the probability of initial response, never-smokers with tumor PD-L1≥50% comprise the only population identified that derived an apparent survival benefit with treatment intensification.
在 PD-L1 表达≥1%的晚期肺腺癌(LUAD)患者中,单独的 PD-(L)1 单药阻断(IO)或与化疗(Chemotherapy-IO)联合应用已被批准为一线治疗方法。这些方案尚未进行前瞻性比较。主要目的是比较晚期 LUAD 患者中一线应用 IO 单药与 Chemotherapy-IO 的疗效。次要目的是探讨临床、病理和基因组特征是否与对 Chemotherapy-IO 与 IO 的不同反应相关。
这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究。纳入标准为接受一线 Chemotherapy-IO 或 IO 治疗的 PD-L1≥1%的晚期 LUAD 患者。为了比较 IO 单药与 Chemotherapy-IO 的一线疗效,我们使用估计的倾向评分进行了逆概率加权 Cox 比例风险模型。
分析的队列纳入了 866 例患者。与 IO 相比,在肿瘤 PD-L1≥1%的患者中,Chemotherapy-IO 与客观缓解率(ORR)(44% vs 35%,p=0.007)和无进展生存期(PFS)改善相关(HR 0.84,95%CI 0.72 至 0.97,p=0.021)或 PD-L1≥50%(ORR 55% vs 38%,p<0.001;PFS HR 0.68,95%CI 0.53 至 0.87,p=0.002)。在使用倾向评分调整的分析中,仅在 PD-L1≥50%亚组的从不吸烟者中,Chemotherapy-IO 与 IO 相比具有差异生存获益(p=0.013)。在肿瘤 PD-L1 表达非常高(≥90%)的患者中,两组之间的结果没有差异。没有基因组因素赋予 Chemotherapy-IO 与 IO 相比的差异生存获益。
虽然化疗联合 PD-(L)1 阻断增加了初始反应的可能性,但在肿瘤 PD-L1≥50%的从不吸烟者中,只有强化治疗才能获得明显的生存获益。