• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估智能家居紧急呼叫系统的有效性和成本效益:德国一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a smart home emergency call system: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Germany.

作者信息

Rehse Hanna, Hasemann Lena, Ludwig Kristina, Elkenkamp Svenja, Kampmann Johanna, Nebling Thomas, Thiem Ulrich, Greiner Wolfgang

机构信息

School of Public Health, AG 5-Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

School of Public Health, AG 5-Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 29;15(4):e092893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092893.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092893
PMID:40306911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12049938/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Falls can lead to serious health-related consequences in the older population. If an emergency occurs within the home environment of an older person living alone, the initiation of emergency care can be delayed, leading to even worse outcomes for this population. Smart home emergency call systems (HECSs) can detect falls and automatically trigger an emergency alarm, potentially reducing time to emergency care and improving outcomes. The INES (Intelligentes NotfallErkennungsSystem-smart emergency detection system) study is a prospective randomised controlled trial conducted in three German federal states that aims to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a smart HECS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Following a telephone interview, individuals aged 70 years or older, living alone, at risk of falling and willing to participate are included in the study. Participants are assigned to one of two groups depending on their previous use of a HECS. Based on the sample size calculation, the study aims to recruit n=498 participants already using a standard HECS (group A) and n=1378 participants who have not used a HECS before (group B). Within both groups, participants are randomised into the intervention arm (IA) and control arm (CA). The IA receives a smart HECS during the 21-month follow-up period. In addition to a standard HECS with a base station and a wearable radio transmitter, the smart HECS includes sensors that can detect falls and automatically trigger an alarm. The primary outcome assessed will be the days spent in the hospital after an emergency admission. Secondary outcomes include the utilisation of healthcare services and their total costs, progression of care dependency, fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and well-being (ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The design and conceptualisation of the INES study were approved by the ethics committee of the Hamburg Medical Association on 26 June 2023 (2023-101032-BO-ff). Results of the INES study will be published in peer-reviewed articles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031408. Registered on 28 June 2023.

摘要

引言

跌倒会给老年人群带来严重的健康相关后果。如果独居老年人的家庭环境中发生紧急情况,紧急护理的启动可能会延迟,从而给该人群带来更糟糕的后果。智能家居紧急呼叫系统(HECS)可以检测到跌倒并自动触发紧急警报,有可能减少紧急护理的时间并改善结果。INES(智能紧急检测系统)研究是一项在德国三个联邦州进行的前瞻性随机对照试验,旨在调查智能HECS的有效性和成本效益。

方法与分析

在电话访谈后,年龄在70岁及以上、独居、有跌倒风险且愿意参与的个体被纳入研究。根据参与者之前是否使用过HECS,将他们分配到两个组之一。根据样本量计算,该研究旨在招募n = 498名已经在使用标准HECS的参与者(A组)和n = 1378名之前未使用过HECS的参与者(B组)。在两组中,参与者被随机分为干预组(IA)和对照组(CA)。IA在21个月的随访期内接受智能HECS。除了带有基站和可穿戴无线电发射器的标准HECS外,智能HECS还包括能够检测跌倒并自动触发警报的传感器。评估的主要结果将是紧急入院后在医院的天数。次要结果包括医疗服务的使用情况及其总成本、护理依赖程度的进展、跌倒恐惧(国际跌倒效能量表)、健康相关生活质量(EQ - 5D - 5L)和幸福感(老年人ICEpop能力测量)。

伦理与传播

INES研究的设计和概念化于2023年6月26日获得汉堡医学协会伦理委员会的批准(2023 - 101032 - BO - ff)。INES研究的结果将发表在同行评审的文章中。

试验注册号

德国临床试验注册中心,德国临床试验注册DRKS00031408。于2023年6月28日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7a/12049938/b6b4a0d796b8/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7a/12049938/b6b4a0d796b8/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7a/12049938/b6b4a0d796b8/bmjopen-15-4-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a smart home emergency call system: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Germany.评估智能家居紧急呼叫系统的有效性和成本效益:德国一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 29;15(4):e092893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092893.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
3
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER)2:一项整群随机试验以及对新协议临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价,该协议用于紧急救护医护人员评估跌倒后的老年人,并在适当时转诊至社区护理。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(13):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130.
4
Can occupational therapist-led home environmental assessment prevent falls in older people? A modified cohort randomised controlled trial protocol.职业治疗师主导的家庭环境评估能否预防老年人跌倒?一项改良队列随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):e022488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022488.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
A multidomain decision support tool to prevent falls in older people: the FinCH cluster RCT.多领域决策支持工具预防老年人跌倒:FinCH 群组 RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(9):1-136. doi: 10.3310/CWIB0236.
7
Effect of cognitive-only and cognitive-motor training on preventing falls in community-dwelling older people: protocol for the smart±step randomised controlled trial.认知训练与认知-运动训练对预防社区居住老年人跌倒的效果:smart±step 随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e029409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029409.
8
A volunteer-supported walking programme to improve physical function in older people (the POWER Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项由志愿者支持的改善老年人身体功能的步行计划(POWER 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01988-9.
9
The REFORM study protocol: a cohort randomised controlled trial of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for the prevention of falls in older people.《REFORM 研究方案:一项针对多方面足病干预预防老年人跌倒的队列随机对照试验》。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 17;4(12):e006977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006977.
10
Home environmental assessments and modification delivered by occupational therapists to reduce falls in people aged 65 years and over: the OTIS RCT.家庭环境评估和职业治疗师进行的改造以减少 65 岁及以上人群跌倒:OTIS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jul;25(46):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta25460.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study.通过电话访谈应用的德语版《保持独立问卷》的效度:一项诊断准确性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0319726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319726. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation of the German falls risk questionnaire, fall risk check (FRC), in community-dwelling seniors : A diagnostic accuracy study.德国跌倒风险问卷“跌倒风险检查(FRC)”在社区居住老年人中的效度验证:一项诊断准确性研究。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s00391-025-02462-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness Evaluation of Smart Home Technology in Preventing and Detecting Falls in Community and Residential Care Settings for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.智能家居技术在预防和检测老年人社区及居家护理环境中跌倒的有效性评估:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Jan;26(1):105347. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105347. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Exploring the impact of experiencing a long lie fall on physical and clinical outcomes in older people requiring an ambulance: A systematic review.探究长时间躺卧跌倒对需要救护车的老年人身体和临床结局的影响:一项系统综述。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2022 May;62:101148. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101148. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Ambient Assisted Living: A Review of Technologies, Methodologies and Future Perspectives for Healthy Aging of Population.
《环境辅助生活:人口健康老龄化的技术、方法和未来展望综述》。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 19;21(10):3549. doi: 10.3390/s21103549.
4
Posthospital Fall Injuries and 30-Day Readmissions in Adults 65 Years and Older.老年人 65 岁及以上患者的院后跌倒损伤和 30 天再入院情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4276.
5
German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.德国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.
6
Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use.建模医疗保健支出和使用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:489-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013517. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Utility of a Medical Alert Protection System compared to telephone follow-up only for home-alone elderly presenting to the ED - A randomized controlled trial.医疗警示保护系统与仅电话随访用于独自在家的就诊于急诊科的老年人的比较 - 一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Healthcare utilization in older patients using personal emergency response systems: an analysis of electronic health records and medical alert data : Brief Description: A Longitudinal Retrospective Analyses of healthcare utilization rates in older patients using Personal Emergency Response Systems from 2011 to 2015.使用个人紧急响应系统的老年患者的医疗保健利用情况:电子健康记录和医疗警报数据的分析:简要描述:对2011年至2015年使用个人紧急响应系统的老年患者医疗保健利用率进行的纵向回顾性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2196-1.
9
Falls, risk factors and fear of falling among persons older than 65 years of age.65岁及以上人群的跌倒、危险因素及跌倒恐惧
Psychogeriatrics. 2017 Jul;17(4):215-223. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12217. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
10
A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture.对髋部骨折后长期残疾结果的批判性综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Sep 2;16(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0332-0.