Yang Ruibao, Lin Jie, Han Guibin, Jiang Guangliang, Deng Yingsheng
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, No. 2105, Building 1, Binhai Pearl, Longhua District, Haikou, Hainan, 570208, China.
Department of Orthopaedic, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, No.2105, Building 1, Binhai Pearl, Longhua District, Haikou, Hainan, 570208, China.
BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02860-6.
This study investigated the accessibility of 3D reconstruction in the fixed coordinate system(3D-R-FCS) based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck in measuring the femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA).
CT and EOS examinations were performed on 40 femoral samples synthesized by Sawbone. Two evaluators were responsible for measurement of the FNAA based on four different methods, including EOS 3D reconstruction, 3D-R-FCS, Reikerås, and Murphy methods.
Measurement of the FNAA based on EOS, 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck, and the Reikerås and Murphy methods were 6.53°±4.28°, 7.08°±4.58°, 3.03°±4.44°, and 11.9°±4.91°, respectively. No statistical difference was detected for the FNAA measurements between EOS and the 3D-R-FCS based on the basal anterior cortex of the femoral neck (P > 0.05). However, a statistical difference was detected between the Reikerås and Murphy methods and EOS (P < 0.05). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 4 methods measured by evaluator A were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.81, respectively, while the ICCs measured by evaluator B were 0.91, 0.98, 0.71, and 0.79, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the two evaluators were 0.89, 0.99, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively.
The consistency of the scores for the FNAA measurement based on the 3D-R-FCS within and between the evaluators was the highest among the four methods and correlated well with the EOS measurement, which may potentially provide a more stable method for the measurement in clinical practice.
Not applicable.
本研究调查了基于股骨颈基底前皮质的固定坐标系三维重建(3D-R-FCS)在测量股骨颈前倾角(FNAA)方面的可及性。
对40个由Sawbone合成的股骨样本进行CT和EOS检查。两名评估者负责基于四种不同方法测量FNAA,包括EOS三维重建、3D-R-FCS、雷凯拉斯法和墨菲法。
基于EOS、基于股骨颈基底前皮质的3D-R-FCS、雷凯拉斯法和墨菲法测量的FNAA分别为6.53°±4.28°、7.08°±4.58°、3.03°±4.44°和11.9°±4.91°。基于EOS和基于股骨颈基底前皮质的3D-R-FCS测量的FNAA之间未检测到统计学差异(P>0.05)。然而,雷凯拉斯法和墨菲法与EOS之间检测到统计学差异(P<0.05)。评估者A测量的四种方法的组内相关系数(ICC)值分别为0.89、0.99、0.75和0.81,而评估者B测量的ICC值分别为0.91、0.98、0.71和0.79。两名评估者之间的相关系数分别为0.89、0.99、0.75和0.83。
在四种方法中,基于3D-R-FCS测量FNAA的评分在评估者内部和评估者之间的一致性最高,并且与EOS测量相关性良好,这可能为临床实践中的测量提供一种更稳定的方法。
不适用。