Riggsby Andrew M
Classics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 4;15(4):376. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040376.
Influential studies in the history of cartography have argued that map-like representations of space were (virtually) unknown in the Classical Mediterranean world and that the cause of this was an absence of underlying cognitive maps. That is, persons in that time/place purportedly had only route/egocentric-type mental representations, not survey/allocentric ones. The present study challenges that cognitive claim by examining the verbal descriptions of plots of land produced by ancient Roman land-measurers. Despite the prescription of a route-based form, actual representations persistently show a variety of features which suggest the existence of underlying survey-type mental models and the integration of those with the route-type ones. This fits better with current views on interaction between types of spatial representation and of cultural difference in this area. The evidence also suggests a linkage between the two kinds of representations.
制图史上有影响力的研究认为,在古典地中海世界,类似地图的空间表征(实际上)并不为人所知,其原因是缺乏潜在的认知地图。也就是说,那个时代/地区的人据称只有基于路线/以自我为中心的心理表征,而没有测量/以他者为中心的表征。本研究通过考察古罗马土地测量员对地块的文字描述,对这一认知主张提出了质疑。尽管规定了基于路线的形式,但实际表征始终呈现出各种特征,这表明存在潜在的测量型心理模型,以及这些模型与路线型模型的整合。这与当前关于空间表征类型之间的相互作用以及该领域文化差异的观点更为契合。证据还表明了这两种表征之间的联系。