Suppr超能文献

基于MRI的双侧关节突关节绞锁型下颈椎骨折脱位的手术规划:一项回顾性队列研究

MRI-Based Surgical Planning for Irreducible Subaxial Cervical Fracture-Dislocation With Bilateral Locked Facet Joints: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Leng Ao, Meng Lingzhi, Li Jiacheng, Shi Song, Guo Mingming, Yu Hailong, Wang Qi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(6):1844-1851. doi: 10.1111/os.70054. Epub 2025 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Subaxial cervical fracture-dislocation with bilateral locked facet joints represents a critical spinal injury. The management of this condition remains a subject of debate, particularly regarding the optimal surgical approach. This study aims to introduce a quantified indicator to guide surgical decision-making and to assess its safety in clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 62 patients treated according to the Spinal Cord Buffer Space (SCBS) criteria with 63 patients treated before SCBS was introduced. Briefly, SCBS was measured on preoperative MRI to quantitatively assess whether sufficient buffer space exists for the spinal cord, ensuring that a posterior reduction can be performed without causing iatrogenic spinal cord injury. The neural status was assessed with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Local sagittal alignment was evaluated at the dislocation level. Fisher's exact test and independent t-test were used to compare the parameters between the two groups.

RESULTS

Surgical planning according to SCBS is relatively safe, with no patient experiencing neurologic deterioration after operation (p = 0.014). Forty-two patients with preoperative grade E on ASIA had no postoperative changes. Thirteen patients with preoperative grade D recovered to grade E after surgery, while 7 patients remained grade D but reported improved limb function. In comparison, 63 patients were treated before SCBS was introduced. Among 47 patients with preoperative grade E, 43 patients remained grade E while 4 patients were downgraded to grade D. For 16 patients with preoperative grade D, there were 2 patients with postoperative grade C, 6 patients with postoperative grade D, and 8 patients with postoperative grade E. No loosening, displacement, or breakage of the implants was observed in both groups during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SCBS is a reliable and quantified indicator for surgical planning, and can significantly reduce the incidence rate of iatrogenic neurologic deterioration. For patients with a positive SCBS, posterior reduction can be safely performed. In contrast, for patients with a negative SCBS, anterior decompression should be prioritized.

摘要

目的

双侧小关节突关节绞锁的下颈椎骨折脱位是一种严重的脊柱损伤。这种情况的治疗仍然存在争议,特别是关于最佳手术入路。本研究旨在引入一种量化指标来指导手术决策,并评估其在临床实践中的安全性。

方法

我们回顾性比较了62例根据脊髓缓冲空间(SCBS)标准治疗的患者与63例在引入SCBS之前治疗的患者。简而言之,在术前MRI上测量SCBS,以定量评估脊髓是否存在足够的缓冲空间,确保可以进行后路复位而不会造成医源性脊髓损伤。用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表评估神经状态。在脱位水平评估局部矢状位对线情况。采用Fisher精确检验和独立t检验比较两组参数。

结果

根据SCBS进行手术规划相对安全,术后无患者出现神经功能恶化(p = 0.014)。42例术前ASIA分级为E级的患者术后无变化。13例术前D级患者术后恢复至E级,7例仍为D级但肢体功能有所改善。相比之下,63例患者在引入SCBS之前接受治疗。47例术前E级患者中,43例仍为E级,4例降级为D级。16例术前D级患者中,术后有2例为C级,6例为D级,8例为E级。随访期间两组均未观察到植入物松动、移位或断裂。

结论

SCBS是手术规划的可靠量化指标,可显著降低医源性神经功能恶化的发生率。对于SCBS阳性的患者,可以安全地进行后路复位。相反,对于SCBS阴性的患者,应优先进行前路减压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验