Long E G, Tsin A T, Robinson B A
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):210-1. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.210-211.1985.
The ability of the FeKal CON-Trate system (Trend Scientific, Minneapolis, Minn.) to recover parasite ova, cysts, or larvae from 300 fecal specimens was compared with that of the Formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation technique. One hundred stool samples had previously been determined to contain 129 parasite forms. The FeKal system detected 127 parasites (sensitivity, 98.4%), and the Formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation technique detected 125 parasites (sensitivity, 96.9%). Higher counts of parasite forms were obtained for 11 of 14 species of parasites in specimens prepared by the FeKal system. Four specimens were negative by the Formalin-ethyl acetate method and two by the FeKal system. These false-negative observations occurred in specimens with low counts of parasites. There were no false-positive results.
将FeKal CON-Trate系统(趋势科学公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)从300份粪便标本中回收寄生虫卵、囊肿或幼虫的能力与福尔马林-乙酸乙酯沉淀技术进行了比较。此前已确定100份粪便样本含有129种寄生虫形态。FeKal系统检测到127种寄生虫(灵敏度为98.4%),福尔马林-乙酸乙酯沉淀技术检测到125种寄生虫(灵敏度为96.9%)。在用FeKal系统制备的标本中,14种寄生虫中有11种的寄生虫形态计数更高。福尔马林-乙酸乙酯法检测有4份标本呈阴性,FeKal系统检测有2份标本呈阴性。这些假阴性结果出现在寄生虫计数较低的标本中。没有假阳性结果。