Wells Jennifer B, Egnot Natalie, Barinas-Mitchell Emma, Brooks Maria M, Mendez Dara D, Thurston Rebecca C
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, 130 N. Bellefield Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Stantec, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Behav Med. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00568-9.
Disparities between Black and White women in stroke risk in the United States are present during midlife, a period during which subclinical indicators of stroke risk accelerate in women. Racism and forms of discrimination have long been associated with cardiovascular pathophysiology. However, few studies have examined midlife discrimination among women and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, a strong predictor of stroke and myocardial infarction. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, which measures discriminatory experiences, was administered to 304 (including 120 White and 76 Black) midlife women (mean age = 54, SD = 3.9) free of clinical cardiovascular disease. At the same visit, using ultrasonography, we measured four markers of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, including plaque count, grey scale median, and maximum plaque height. The majority (85%) of women experienced at least one form of discrimination in their daily life. Black women reported experiencing greater discrimination than White women with a mean (SD) Everyday Discrimination Score of 7.3 (5.2) versus 5.7 (4.3). These experiences were most attributed to race, age, income, and "other." Black participants had a higher prevalence of carotid plaque compared to White participants (52% versus 46%). Using Poisson regression, higher discrimination was associated with higher plaque count among Black women only, adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and education, such that one standard deviation increase in the Everyday Discrimination Scale was associated with a 25% higher plaque count. Further adjusting for financial strain did not reduce the effect size. We did not observe an association between discrimination and other carotid plaque measures in Black or White women. In Black women, higher levels of discrimination was associated with greater carotid atherosclerosis. Clarifying the relationship between discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke risk could inform social and healthcare interventions to reduce discrimination and potential associated stroke risk.
美国黑人女性和白人女性在中风风险方面的差异在中年时期就已存在,这一时期女性中风风险的亚临床指标加速发展。长期以来,种族主义和各种形式的歧视一直与心血管病理生理学相关。然而,很少有研究探讨女性中年时期的歧视与亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化之间的关系,而亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化是中风和心肌梗死的有力预测指标。我们对304名(包括120名白人女性和76名黑人女性)无临床心血管疾病的中年女性(平均年龄 = 54岁,标准差 = 3.9)进行了日常歧视量表调查,该量表用于衡量歧视经历。在同一次就诊时,我们使用超声测量了亚临床颈动脉粥样硬化的四个指标,包括斑块计数、灰度中位数和最大斑块高度。大多数(85%)女性在日常生活中至少经历过一种形式的歧视。黑人女性报告的歧视经历比白人女性更多,日常歧视量表的平均(标准差)得分分别为7.3(5.2)和5.7(4.3)。这些经历主要归因于种族、年龄、收入和“其他”。与白人参与者相比,黑人参与者颈动脉斑块的患病率更高(52%对46%)。使用泊松回归分析,仅在黑人女性中,更高的歧视程度与更高的斑块计数相关,在调整年龄、收缩压、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和教育程度后,日常歧视量表得分每增加一个标准差,斑块计数就会增加25%。进一步调整经济压力并没有降低效应大小。我们在黑人或白人女性中未观察到歧视与其他颈动脉斑块测量指标之间的关联。在黑人女性中,更高程度的歧视与更严重的颈动脉粥样硬化相关。阐明歧视与中风风险亚临床指标之间的关系可为减少歧视和潜在相关中风风险的社会及医疗干预提供参考。