Hutchinson John M, Ruan Yibing, Chia Brendan J, Brown Carl J, Hilsden Robert J, Loree Jonathan M, Brenner Darren R
Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
JAMA Oncol. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0908.
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is an emerging approach for colorectal cancer screening that has been approved in the US. The impact of cfDNA testing in the Canadian setting, assuming adherence mirroring prior real-world cfDNA work and assay performance from a Guardant Health study, is unknown.
To estimate how cfDNA screening impacts clinical and economic outcomes in Canada compared with existing screening approaches (fecal immunochemical testing [FIT] or colonoscopies).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The OncoSim-Colorectal model (version 3.6.5.7) was used to simulate participation, relative effectiveness, and cost of introduction of cfDNA tests every 3 years. A population of 32 million Canadians were simulated and examined for outcomes and costs between 2024 and 2092.
Screening with colonoscopy, FIT, or cfDNA.
Screen-detected colorectal cancer cases, deaths, health-adjusted person-years, potential years of life lost, and cost of cancer screening and management were examined.
Under higher participation, cfDNA detected 393 087 cases of colorectal cancer between 2024 and 2092 compared with 156 009 cases in the FIT scenario, and cfDNA reduced overall mortality by 121 383 deaths compared with current predictions with FIT. Linear regression models indicated that approximately 78% participation with 80% adherence or 69% participation with 100% adherence to cfDNA screening would be required to reduce deaths below the levels achieved by colonoscopy testing. Higher costs were associated with cfDNA testing, where each health-adjusted person-year had a cost of CAD $234.80 (US $164.06), and 0.025 deaths were averted per CAD $100 000 (US $69 874) additional dollars spent compared with FIT testing. When cfDNA testing was modeled with the same participation as FIT testing (43%), there was worse overall population impact (eg, greater number of deaths), emphasizing the importance of high participation for cfDNA testing to improve outcomes.
This study suggests that cfDNA testing could result in increased detection of colorectal cancer and reduced mortality if higher participation than reported in previous studies is achieved at the population level. Patient input on acceptance of blood-based vs stool-based screening may help inform real-world implementation.
游离DNA(cfDNA)检测是一种新兴的结直肠癌筛查方法,已在美国获得批准。在加拿大的环境下,假设依从性反映先前的真实世界cfDNA研究工作以及Guardant Health研究中的检测性能,cfDNA检测的影响尚不清楚。
评估与现有筛查方法(粪便免疫化学检测[FIT]或结肠镜检查)相比,cfDNA筛查对加拿大临床和经济结果的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:使用OncoSim - 结直肠癌模型(版本3.6.5.7)来模拟每3年进行一次cfDNA检测的参与情况、相对有效性和引入成本。模拟了3200万加拿大人的人群,并研究了2024年至2092年期间的结果和成本。
结肠镜检查、FIT或cfDNA筛查。
检查筛查发现的结直肠癌病例、死亡人数、健康调整人年数、潜在寿命损失年数以及癌症筛查和管理成本。
在更高的参与率下,2024年至2092年期间cfDNA检测出393087例结直肠癌病例,而FIT方案为156009例,与当前FIT预测相比,cfDNA使总死亡率降低了121383例死亡。线性回归模型表明,要将死亡人数降低到结肠镜检查所达到的水平以下,cfDNA筛查需要约78%的参与率和80%的依从性,或69%的参与率和100%的依从性。cfDNA检测成本更高,每健康调整人年成本为234.80加元(164.06美元),与FIT检测相比,每额外花费100000加元(69874美元)可避免0.025例死亡。当以与FIT检测相同的参与率(43%)对cfDNA检测进行建模时,总体人群影响更差(例如,死亡人数更多),强调了高参与率对cfDNA检测改善结果的重要性。
本研究表明,如果在人群水平上实现比先前研究报告更高的参与率,cfDNA检测可能会增加结直肠癌的检测并降低死亡率。患者对接受基于血液与基于粪便的筛查的意见可能有助于为实际实施提供参考。