Suppr超能文献

比较伐替诺昔-美托咪定-氯胺酮-布托啡诺与美托咪定-氯胺酮-布托啡诺组合用于新西兰白兔(穴兔)肌肉注射麻醉的效果。

Comparison of vatinoxan-medetomidine-ketamine-butorphanol and medetomidine-ketamine-butorphanol combinations for intramuscular anesthesia in New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

作者信息

Lutvikadic Ismar, Douglas Hope, Hopster Klaus

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies - New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America; Department of Clinical Science, University of Sarajevo - Veterinary Faculty, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Department of Clinical Studies - New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

Res Vet Sci. 2025 Jul;190:105671. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105671. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

Abstract

Rabbit perianesthetic morbidity and mortality are high due to unique physiologic and anatomic considerations. α2-adrenergic agonists are frequently used for sedation and anesthesia. However, these drugs can produce negative cardiovascular effects. A commercially available formulation licensed for sedation in dogs (Zenalpha®) combines medetomidine with vatinoxan, a peripherally acting α2-adrenergic antagonist. We evaluated this vatinoxan-medetomidine combination (2 mg/kg of vatinoxan-0.1 mg/kg of medetomidine) co-administered with ketamine (5 mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.5 mg/kg) (ZKB) in rabbits and compared the cardiopulmonary effects and quality of anesthesia to a previously described intramuscular anesthetic protocol using medetomidine (0.1 mg/kg), ketamine (5 mg/kg), and butorphanol (0.5 mg/kg) (MKB). Onset and duration of anesthesia as well as heart rate (HR), arterial blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂), body temperature, and blood pressure were measured and compared. Data was analyzed by using ANOVA and Friedman test (p < 0.05). Animals in group ZKB had a significantly lower mean arterial blood pressure (47 ± 2 mmHg vs 71 ± 5 mmHg, p < 0.01) and higher HR (206 ± 23 bpm vs 150 ± 14 bpm, p < 0.01) during anesthesia when compared to group MKB. ZKB anesthesia induction time was longer (470 ± 110 s vs 301 ± 44 s, p = 0.03) when compared to group MKB, while anesthesia and recovery times were similar between protocols. These findings suggest that the clinical applicability of the ZKB protocol at the tested dose may be limited due to its significant hypotensive effects.

摘要

由于独特的生理和解剖学因素,兔麻醉期间的发病率和死亡率很高。α2-肾上腺素能激动剂常用于镇静和麻醉。然而,这些药物会产生负面的心血管效应。一种在犬类中获许可用于镇静的市售制剂(Zenalpha®)将美托咪定与外周作用的α2-肾上腺素能拮抗剂瓦替诺生联合使用。我们评估了这种瓦替诺生-美托咪定组合(2 mg/kg瓦替诺生-0.1 mg/kg美托咪定)与氯胺酮(5 mg/kg)和布托啡诺(0.5 mg/kg)联合应用于兔(ZKB)的情况,并将心肺效应和麻醉质量与先前描述的使用美托咪定(0.1 mg/kg)、氯胺酮(5 mg/kg)和布托啡诺(0.5 mg/kg)的肌肉注射麻醉方案(MKB)进行比较。测量并比较麻醉的起效时间和持续时间以及心率(HR)、动脉血氧饱和度(SpO₂)、体温和血压。数据采用方差分析和弗里德曼检验进行分析(p < 0.05)。与MKB组相比,ZKB组动物在麻醉期间平均动脉血压显著更低(47 ± 2 mmHg对71 ± 5 mmHg,p < 0.01)且心率更高(206 ± 23 bpm对150 ± 14 bpm,p < 0.01)。与MKB组相比,ZKB组麻醉诱导时间更长(470 ± 110 s对301 ± 44 s,p = 0.03),而不同方案之间的麻醉和恢复时间相似。这些发现表明,ZKB方案在测试剂量下的临床适用性可能因其显著的降压作用而受到限制。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验