Knowler William C, Doherty Lindsay, Edelstein Sharon L, Bennett Peter H, Dabelea Dana, Hoskin Mary, Kahn Steven E, Kalyani Rita R, Kim Catherine, Pi-Sunyer F Xavier, Raghavan Sridharan, Shah Vallabh O, Temprosa Marinella, Venditti Elizabeth M, Nathan David M
Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA.
Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025 Jun;13(6):469-481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00022-1. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
In the US Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a 3-year randomised clinical trial in 3234 adults with prediabetes, type 2 diabetes incidence was reduced by 58% with intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) and by 31% with metformin, compared with placebo. We sought to assess the long-term effects and potential heterogeneity of treatment effects over approximately 21 years of follow-up.
The DPP trial was continued with protocol modifications as the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS). In the DPPOS, placebo was discontinued, metformin (850 mg twice a day as tolerated) was continued after unmasking, and group-based booster intervention classes were offered to the ILS group twice a year; additionally, all participants were offered group-based lifestyle intervention four times a year. The prespecified primary outcome during DPP and DPPOS was diabetes incidence defined by American Diabetes Association criteria. The DPPOS protocol specified continued diabetes incidence as an outcome; Feb 23, 2020, was chosen as the closing date for the present analysis, as a date prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused major disruptions in clinic visits and complicated longitudinal data analyses. We assessed long-term persistence of intervention effects on diabetes incidence, and heterogeneity of effects in subgroups defined by baseline diabetes risk factors. Follow-up is reported for the combined study from July 31, 1996, to Feb 23, 2020, and analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00004992 (DPP) and NCT00038727 (DPPOS); follow-up is ongoing but the trial is closed to enrolment except for previous DPP participants.
3195 participants originally enrolled in the DPP were included in the present analyses. This population comprised 2171 (67·9%) female participants and 1024 (32·1%) male participants, with a mean baseline age of 50·6 years (SD 10·7). Individual follow-up times ranged from 0·2 to 23·2 years (median 8·0 years [IQR 3·0 to 18·0]); remaining numbers at risk decreased sharply after 21 years because of administrative censoring and thus follow-up was considered to represent a 21-year period. During follow-up, compared with placebo, diabetes incidence rate was reduced in the original ILS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·68 to 0·85], rate difference [RD] -1·59 cases [95% CI -2·25 to -0·93] per 100 person-years) and in the original metformin group (HR 0·83 [0·74 to 0·93], RD -1·17 [-1·85 to -0·49]), with corresponding increases in median diabetes-free survival of 3·5 years and 2·5 years, and mean diabetes-free survival of 2·0 years (95% CI 1·2 to 2·8) and 1·2 years (0·4 to 2·0), respectively. The diabetes cumulative incidence curves separated early, especially in the first 3 years, with lower incidence rates in the metformin and ILS groups than in the placebo group. The metformin and ILS curves progressively converged with longer follow-up. The overall treatment effects appeared to result from large early effects during the DPP. Absolute intervention effects, measured as RDs versus placebo, were greater with ILS in participants with higher values for baseline fasting glucose, HbA, and multivariable clinical and physiological risk indices, and with metformin in younger participants.
The large initial intervention effects seen in the DPP trial were followed by sustained reductions in cumulative diabetes incidence for 21 years. Intervention effects were heterogeneous according to some baseline variables. These findings could guide precision interventions to help address the current type 2 diabetes epidemic.
US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and other agencies.
For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
在美国糖尿病预防计划(DPP)中,一项针对3234例糖尿病前期成年人的为期3年的随机临床试验表明,与安慰剂相比,强化生活方式干预(ILS)使2型糖尿病发病率降低了58%,二甲双胍使其降低了31%。我们试图评估在约21年的随访中治疗效果的长期影响和潜在异质性。
DPP试验在方案修改后继续进行,作为DPP结局研究(DPPOS)。在DPPOS中,停用安慰剂,二甲双胍(每日两次,每次850 mg,可耐受)在揭盲后继续使用,并且每年为ILS组提供两次基于小组的强化干预课程;此外,每年为所有参与者提供四次基于小组的生活方式干预。DPP和DPPOS期间预先设定的主要结局是根据美国糖尿病协会标准定义的糖尿病发病率。DPPOS方案将持续的糖尿病发病率指定为一个结局;选择2020年2月23日作为本次分析的截止日期,这是在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前的一个日期,该大流行导致门诊就诊严重中断并使纵向数据分析复杂化。我们评估了干预对糖尿病发病率影响的长期持续性,以及由基线糖尿病风险因素定义的亚组中效应的异质性。报告了从1996年7月31日至2020年2月23日的联合研究的随访情况,分析采用意向性分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT00004992(DPP)和NCT00038727(DPPOS);随访仍在进行,但除了之前的DPP参与者外,该试验已停止招募。
本分析纳入了最初参加DPP的3195名参与者。该人群包括2171名(67.9%)女性参与者和1024名(32.1%)男性参与者,平均基线年龄为50.6岁(标准差10.7)。个体随访时间从0.2年至23.2年不等(中位数8.0年[四分位间距3.0至18.0]);由于行政审查,21年后仍处于风险中的人数急剧下降,因此随访被视为代表21年的时间段。在随访期间,与安慰剂相比,原ILS组的糖尿病发病率降低(风险比[HR]0.76[95%置信区间0.68至0.85],率差[RD]-1.59例[95%置信区间-2.25至-0.93]每100人年),原二甲双胍组也降低(HR0.83[0.74至0.93],RD-1.17[-1.85至-0.49]),相应的无糖尿病生存期的中位数分别增加了3.5年和2.5年,无糖尿病生存期的均值分别增加了2.0年(95%置信区间1.2至2.8)和1.2年(0.4至2.0)。糖尿病累积发病率曲线在早期就分开了,尤其是在最初3年,二甲双胍组和ILS组的发病率低于安慰剂组。随着随访时间延长,二甲双胍组和ILS组的曲线逐渐趋同。总体治疗效果似乎源于DPP期间早期的显著效果。以与安慰剂相比的RD衡量的绝对干预效果,在基线空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白以及多变量临床和生理风险指数值较高的参与者中,ILS的效果更大,在较年轻的参与者中,二甲双胍的效果更大。
DPP试验中观察到的巨大初始干预效果之后是21年累积糖尿病发病率的持续降低。干预效果根据一些基线变量存在异质性。这些发现可为精准干预提供指导,以帮助应对当前的2型糖尿病流行。
美国国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所及其他机构。
摘要的西班牙语译文见补充材料部分。