Lee Yookyoung, Oh Ju Hyun, Lee Dongik, Kang Mijeong, Lee Seunghun
Department of Physics, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.
Department of Optics and Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 1;15(1):15310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99423-9.
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have been transforming the ways we approach science tasks, including data analysis, experimental design, writing, and literature review. However, due to the lack of specialized knowledge and inherent issues such as plagiarism and hallucinations (i.e., false or misleading outputs), it is necessary for users to verify the output information. To address these issues, prompt engineering has become a significant task. In this study, we evaluate the performance of different prompt styles for extracting information from literature abstracts and emphasize the importance of prompt engineering for such scientific tasks. The literature on white phosphor materials is used for this study due to the availability of important and quantitative information in the abstracts. Through detailed comparative and quantitative evaluation, we provide guidance on preparing suitable and effective prompts based on the types of information sought.
诸如ChatGPT之类的大语言模型(LLMs)的最新进展正在改变我们处理科学任务的方式,包括数据分析、实验设计、写作和文献综述。然而,由于缺乏专业知识以及存在诸如抄袭和幻觉(即错误或误导性输出)等固有问题,用户有必要验证输出信息。为了解决这些问题,提示工程已成为一项重要任务。在本研究中,我们评估了从文献摘要中提取信息的不同提示风格的性能,并强调了提示工程对于此类科学任务的重要性。由于摘要中可获取重要的定量信息,因此本研究使用了关于白色磷光体材料的文献。通过详细的比较和定量评估,我们根据所需信息的类型,为准备合适且有效的提示提供指导。