Suppr超能文献

生命线队列研究中功能性障碍和内化性障碍的家族共聚集性及家族共性

Familial coaggregation and shared familiality of functional and internalizing disorders in the Lifelines cohort.

作者信息

Bos Martje, Monden Rei, Wray Naomi R, Zhou Yiling, Kendler Kenneth S, Rosmalen Judith G M, van Loo Hanna M, Snieder Harold

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Informatics and Data Science Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2025 May 2;55:e126. doi: 10.1017/S003329172500100X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional disorders (FDs) are characterized by persistent somatic symptoms and are highly comorbid with internalizing disorders (IDs). To provide much-needed insight into FD etiology, we evaluated FD and ID familial coaggregation and shared familiality.

METHODS

Lifelines is a three-generation cohort study, which assessed three FDs (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome [ME/CFS], irritable bowel syndrome [IBS], and fibromyalgia [FM]) and six IDs (major depressive disorder [MDD], dysthymia [DYS], generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], agoraphobia [AGPH], social phobia [SPH], and panic disorder [PD]) according to diagnostic criteria. Based on 153,803 individuals, including 90,397 with a first-degree relative in Lifelines, we calculated recurrence risk ratios (λs) and tetrachoric correlations to evaluate familial aggregation and coaggregation of these disorders in first-degree relatives. We then estimated their familiality and familial correlations.

RESULTS

Familial aggregation was observed across disorders, with λ ranging from 1.45 to 2.23 within disorders and from 1.17 to 1.94 across disorders. Familiality estimates ranged from 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-29) for IBS to 42% (95% CI: 33-50) for ME/CFS. Familial correlations ranged from +0.37 (95% CI: 0.24-0.51) between FM and AGPH to +0.97 (95% CI: 0.80-1) between ME/CFS and FM. The highest familial correlation between an ID and FD was +0.83 (95% CI: 0.66-0.99) for MDD and ME/CFS.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear familial component to FDs, which is partially shared with IDs. This suggests that IDs and FDs share both genetic and family-environmental risk factors. Of the FDs, ME/CFS is most closely related to IDs.

摘要

背景

功能性障碍(FDs)以持续的躯体症状为特征,且与内化性障碍(IDs)高度共病。为了深入了解FD的病因,我们评估了FD和ID的家族共聚集性及共同家族性。

方法

生命线研究是一项三代队列研究,根据诊断标准评估了三种FD(肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征[ME/CFS]、肠易激综合征[IBS]和纤维肌痛[FM])和六种ID(重度抑郁症[MDD]、心境恶劣障碍[DYS]、广泛性焦虑障碍[GAD]、广场恐惧症[AGPH]、社交恐惧症[SPH]和惊恐障碍[PD])。基于153,803名个体,其中包括90,397名在生命线研究中有一级亲属的个体,我们计算了复发风险比(λs)和四分相关系数,以评估这些障碍在一级亲属中的家族聚集性和共聚集性。然后我们估计了它们的家族性和家族相关性。

结果

在所有障碍中均观察到家族聚集性,各障碍内的λ范围为1.45至2.23,跨障碍的λ范围为1.17至1.94。家族性估计值范围从IBS的22%(95%置信区间[CI]:16 - 29)到ME/CFS的42%(95%CI:33 - 5)。家族相关性范围从FM与AGPH之间的+0.37(95%CI:0.24 - 0.51)到ME/CFS与FM之间的+0.97(95%CI:0.80 - 1)。ID和FD之间最高的家族相关性是MDD与ME/CFS之间的+0.83(95%CI:0.66 - 0.99)。

结论

FD存在明显的家族成分,且部分与ID共享。这表明ID和FD共享遗传和家庭环境风险因素。在FD中,ME/CFS与ID关系最为密切。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5deb/12094627/fa88cdbbf2c5/S003329172500100X_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验