Neupane Sonisha, Skerswetat Jan, Bex Peter J
Northeastern University, College of Science, Department of Psychology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, 850 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, California, 92697, United States of America.
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 25:2025.04.23.25325959. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.23.25325959.
Stereopsis is a critical visual function, however clinical stereotests are time-consuming, coarse in resolution, suffer low test-retest repeatability, and poor agreement with other tests. We developed AIM Stereoacuity to address these limitations and asked whether it could deliver reliable, efficient, and precise stereo-thresholds across stimulus types and disparity signs.
Observers reported the orientation of 5×1.25° bar defined by disparity of random dots embedded in a 6° diameter circular cell, presented in a 4*4 grid. Bar disparity was scaled from ± 2σ relative to a threshold and slope-estimate, initially set by the experimenter and adaptively updated. Orientation report errors (indicated vs. actual bar-orientation) were fit with a cumulative Gaussian function to derive stereo-thresholds. Twenty-one normally-sighted observers were tested with red-blue anaglyphs in crossed and uncrossed disparity signs across 4 element-types (8.5arcmin broadband dots, or band-pass difference of Gaussians with peak Spatial-Frequency (SF) of 2, 4, or 6 c/°). We analyzed stereoacuities, test durations, and the test-retest repeatability.
Across SFs and observers, test duration for a chart were 36 and 40 secs for measuring crossed and uncrossed disparity, respectively. There was no effect of disparity sign or SF (Kruskal-Wallis; p>0.05). Median log stereo-thresholds averaged across all SFs were 1.90 and 1.84 log arcsec for crossed and uncrossed disparities, respectively. Crossed and uncrossed disparities were moderately correlated across SFs(r=0.44 to 0.79; median=0.54). Test-retest biases were 0.01 arcsec (p=0.45) and 0.10 arcsec (p= 0.001) for crossed and uncrossed disparities, respectively.
The results for the response-adaptive, self-administered AIM Stereoacuity method showed no significant stereo-thresholds differences between broad- and narrow-band stimuli. The test delivers repeatable results for crossed disparity in approximately 80 seconds.
立体视觉是一项关键的视觉功能,然而临床立体视测试耗时、分辨率粗糙、重测重复性低,且与其他测试的一致性较差。我们开发了AIM立体视敏度测试来解决这些局限性,并探讨其是否能在不同刺激类型和视差符号下提供可靠、高效且精确的立体视阈值。
观察者报告由嵌入直径6°圆形单元中的随机点视差定义的5×1.25°条形的方向,该条形以4×4网格形式呈现。条形视差相对于最初由实验者设定并自适应更新的阈值和斜率估计值按±2σ进行缩放。方向报告误差(指示的与实际的条形方向)用累积高斯函数拟合以得出立体视阈值。21名视力正常的观察者使用红蓝色立体图,在4种元素类型(8.5角分宽带点,或峰值空间频率(SF)为2、4或6 c/°的高斯带通差异)下测试交叉和非交叉视差符号。我们分析了立体视敏度、测试持续时间和重测重复性。
在所有空间频率和观察者中,测量交叉视差和非交叉视差时,一张图表的测试持续时间分别为36秒和40秒。视差符号或空间频率没有影响(Kruskal-Wallis检验;p>0.05)。所有空间频率下平均的对数立体视阈值,交叉视差和非交叉视差分别为1.90和1.84对数角秒。交叉视差和非交叉视差在不同空间频率下呈中度相关(r = 0.44至0.79;中位数 = 0.54)。交叉视差和非交叉视差的重测偏差分别为0.01角秒(p = 0.45)和0.10角秒(p = 0.001)。
响应自适应、自我管理的AIM立体视敏度测试方法的结果表明,宽带和窄带刺激之间的立体视阈值没有显著差异。该测试在大约80秒内可得出交叉视差的可重复结果。