Trimble Michael
Centre for Medical Education, Queen's University, Belfast Mulhouse Building, 1st Floor, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, Email:
Ulster Med J. 2025 Apr;94(1):42-46. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
On 29 November 2024, the House of Commons voted in favour of legalising assisted suicide. The aim of the Bill is to "allow adults who are terminally ill, subject to safeguards and protections, to request and be provided with assistance to end their own life." At the time of writing, the Bill is under consideration at the Committee stage. This paper considers the implications of the bill and the appropriateness of using the "slippery slope" argument in its critique. It may be seen that when considering the practice of assisted suicide in jurisdictions where it has been legalised, the empirical form of the argument is shown to be valid. However, the logical form of the argument is less relevant as, once the principle is conceded, there are no further significant barriers and the slope is, in fact, a cliff edge. History shows that the proposed safeguards are unlikely to be robust or sufficient to withstand challenge.
2024年11月29日,英国下议院投票赞成协助自杀合法化。该法案的目的是“允许身患绝症的成年人在受到保障和保护的情况下,请求并获得协助以结束自己的生命”。在撰写本文时,该法案正处于委员会审议阶段。本文探讨了该法案的影响以及在批评中使用“滑坡谬误”论点的适当性。可以看出,在考虑协助自杀在已合法化的司法管辖区的实践时,该论点的实证形式被证明是有效的。然而,该论点的逻辑形式相关性较低,因为一旦承认这一原则,就不再有进一步的重大障碍,实际上这个斜坡就是悬崖边缘。历史表明,提议的保障措施不太可能强大或足以抵御挑战。