Gnanapragasam Vincent J
Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge.
Cambridge Prostate Cancer and Clinical Trials Group.
Curr Opin Urol. 2025 Jul 1;35(4):426-431. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001294. Epub 2025 May 2.
To review the current risk and prognostic stratification systems in localised prostate cancer. To explore some of the most promising adjuncts to clinical models and what the evidence has shown regarding their value.
There are many new biomarker-based models seeking to improve, optimise or replace clinical models. There are promising data on the value of MRI, radiomics, genomic classifiers and most recently artificial intelligence tools in refining stratification. Despite the extensive literature however, there remains uncertainty on where in pathways they can provide the most benefit and whether a biomarker is most useful for prognosis or predictive use. Comparisons studies have also often overlooked the fact that clinical models have themselves evolved and the context of the baseline used in biomarker studies that have shown superiority have to be considered.
For new biomarkers to be included in stratification models, well designed prospective clinical trials are needed. Until then, there needs to be caution in interpretation of their use for day-to-day decision making. It is critical that users balance any purported incremental value against the performance of the latest clinical classification and multivariate models especially as the latter are cost free and widely available.
回顾局限性前列腺癌当前的风险和预后分层系统。探讨一些最有前景的临床模型辅助手段以及证据所显示的其价值。
有许多基于新生物标志物的模型试图改进、优化或取代临床模型。在磁共振成像(MRI)、影像组学、基因组分类器以及最近的人工智能工具在细化分层方面的价值上,有一些很有前景的数据。然而,尽管有大量文献,但对于它们在哪些途径中能提供最大益处,以及一种生物标志物对预后还是预测用途最有用,仍存在不确定性。比较研究也常常忽略了临床模型本身已经演变这一事实,并且必须考虑显示出优越性的生物标志物研究中所使用基线的背景情况。
要将新的生物标志物纳入分层模型,需要精心设计的前瞻性临床试验。在此之前,在将其用于日常决策的解读中需谨慎。至关重要的是,使用者要权衡任何所谓的增量价值与最新临床分类和多变量模型的性能,特别是因为后者是免费且广泛可用的。