• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1973 - 1983年丧偶研究中的抽样技术调查

Survey of sampling techniques in widowhood research, 1973-1983.

作者信息

Gentry M, Shulman A D

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1985 Sep;40(5):641-3. doi: 10.1093/geronj/40.5.641.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/40.5.641
PMID:4031413
Abstract

This study focused on the use and reporting of sampling procedures found in research on widowhood. The population of all empirical studies on widowhood listed in the Psychological Abstracts and the Sociological Abstracts from 1973 through 1983 was examined with regard to the nature of the sampling procedures used. The results suggest a less-than-desirable state of affairs in such research. Thirty-three percent of the studies did not even contain information on the sampling procedures used. Most investigators who did specify the sampling procedure did not acknowledge awareness of the limitations of generalizations of the results in concordance with the sampling procedures used. Such lack of attention to matters of scientific methodology does not bode well for the advancement of knowledge in this area.

摘要

本研究聚焦于丧偶研究中抽样程序的使用与报告。对1973年至1983年《心理学文摘》和《社会学文摘》中列出的所有丧偶实证研究的总体,就所使用抽样程序的性质进行了考察。结果表明此类研究的状况不尽如人意。33%的研究甚至未包含所使用抽样程序的信息。大多数明确说明了抽样程序的研究者,并未承认意识到根据所使用的抽样程序对结果进行概括存在局限性。对科学方法论问题如此缺乏关注,对该领域知识的进步并非好兆头。

相似文献

1
Survey of sampling techniques in widowhood research, 1973-1983.1973 - 1983年丧偶研究中的抽样技术调查
J Gerontol. 1985 Sep;40(5):641-3. doi: 10.1093/geronj/40.5.641.
2
The effect of widowhood on health: a prospective analysis from the Massachusetts Women's Health Study.
Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(9):1063-70. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90011-z.
3
Survey sampling issues in primary care research.基层医疗研究中的抽样调查问题。
Fam Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;23(7):539-43.
4
Leading the way: guidance to quality scientific reporting.引领方向:高质量科学报告指南
J Sex Med. 2010 Jun;7(6):1983-1984. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01861.x.
5
6
Room for improvement? Reporting response rates and recruitment in nursing research in the past decade.仍有改进空间?过去十年护理研究中的报告回应率与招募情况
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Sep;51(5):502-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03521.x.
7
Widowhood, sex, labor force participation, and the use of physician services by elderly adults.老年丧偶、性别、劳动力参与率与医生服务利用情况
J Gerontol. 1986 Nov;41(6):793-6. doi: 10.1093/geronj/41.6.793.
8
How to assess a research study.如何评估一项研究。
Am J Nurs. 1996 Dec;96(12):32-6; quiz 37.
9
Demography and aging: long term effects of divorce, early widowhood, and migration on resources and integration in old age.人口统计学与老龄化:离婚、早年丧偶和移民对老年资源与融入的长期影响。
Korea J Popul Dev. 1995 Dec;24(2):275-99.
10
Sex matters: Report experimenter gender.
Science. 2017 Jun 2;356(6341):916-917. doi: 10.1126/science.aan5448.