Rosell Julieta A, Vetter Susanne, Olson Mark E, Greve Michelle
Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A.P. 70-275, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Department of Botany, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa.
Ann Bot. 2025 Jul 14;135(6):1215-1228. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaf019.
Forest expansion into savannas is widespread even though fire and seasonal drought provide environmental conditions against encroachment by forest specialists. A distinct suite of species can establish under savanna trees, forming bush clumps and facilitating forest establishment. Understanding the functional traits of clump-forming species is crucial for uncovering encroachment mechanisms and devising management strategies. Bark likely plays a key role in enabling clump initiation. Fire resistance can be achieved by accumulation of outer bark thickness (OBT), height and/or stem diameter (SD), while drought resistance may be enhanced by greater inner bark thickness (IBT), associated with water and carbohydrate storage.
We selected representative savanna, clump-forming and closed-canopy species (ecological categories) at two South African sites experiencing forest expansion and differing in rainfall and fire frequency. We compared OBT-SD and IBT-SD allometries across ecological categories and sites and examined whether categories separated along axes reflecting fire/drought resistance (OBT and IBT) and resource allocation strategy (density and water content, leaf size).
OBT-SD scaling of clump-forming species was more similar to savanna than forest species, and savanna species at the more fire-prone savanna had steeper OBT-SD scaling, consistent with high OBT providing fire protection in early clump formation. Similar IBT-SD slope across groups was consistent with similar metabolic needs, while higher intercepts in savanna and clump-forming species indicated higher water storage. 'Cheap' low-density tissues in savanna species allow fast accumulation of SD and OBT and resistance to fire topkill. Closed-canopy species had denser tissues and thin stems and bark for a given height, while the clump-forming species were intermediate.
Bark and probably other traits are key in the capacity of some species to form bush clumps. Identifying these traits and the mechanisms underlying clump formation is essential for managing encroached savannas and grasslands.
尽管火灾和季节性干旱为森林物种的侵入提供了不利的环境条件,但森林向稀树草原的扩张仍很普遍。有一类独特的物种能够在稀树草原的树木下生长,形成灌丛,促进森林的形成。了解形成灌丛的物种的功能特性对于揭示侵入机制和制定管理策略至关重要。树皮可能在灌丛起始过程中起关键作用。通过积累外层树皮厚度(OBT)、高度和/或茎直径(SD)可实现耐火性,而与水和碳水化合物储存相关的内层树皮厚度(IBT)增加可能会增强抗旱性。
我们在南非两个经历森林扩张且降雨和火灾频率不同的地点,选择了具有代表性的稀树草原、形成灌丛和郁闭冠层的物种(生态类别)。我们比较了不同生态类别和地点的OBT-SD和IBT-SD异速生长关系,并研究了这些类别是否沿反映耐火性/抗旱性(OBT和IBT)和资源分配策略(密度和含水量、叶片大小)的轴进行区分。
形成灌丛的物种的OBT-SD缩放比与森林物种相比更类似于稀树草原物种,且在火灾频发的稀树草原上的稀树草原物种具有更陡的OBT-SD缩放比,这与高OBT在灌丛形成早期提供防火保护一致。各组间相似的IBT-SD斜率与相似的代谢需求一致,而稀树草原和形成灌丛的物种中较高的截距表明其具有更高的水分储存。稀树草原物种中“廉价”的低密度组织允许快速积累SD和OBT,并抵抗火灾致死。郁闭冠层物种在给定高度下具有更致密的组织以及更细的茎和树皮,而形成灌丛的物种则介于两者之间。
树皮以及可能的其他特性是一些物种形成灌丛能力的关键。识别这些特性以及灌丛形成的潜在机制对于管理被侵占的稀树草原和草原至关重要。