Mulherkar Ria, Grimm David, Sukumvanich Paniti, Courtney-Brooks Madeleine, Boisen Michelle, Berger Jessica, Taylor Sarah, Lesnock Jamie, Rush Shannon, Garrett Allison, Mahdi Haider, Comerci John, Olaiwaye Alexander, Edwards Robert, Doraisamy Elangovan, Hajduk Michael, Houser Christopher J, Kim Hayeon, Vargo John Austin
Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UPMC Magee Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
Brachytherapy. 2025 Jul-Aug;24(4):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 May 1.
Several factors of template-based interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers, including large tumor size, invasion into adjacent organs or fistula, dose heterogeneity, and twice daily fractionation cause inherent dose-escalation effects, potentially increasing toxicity. This study reports a single-institutional dose escalation experience in twice daily template-based interstitial brachytherapy treatments to demonstrate tumor control and toxicity outcomes, with the hypothesis that with image-based planning dose-escalation with interstitial brachytherapy is safe and efficacious.
Patients treated with template-based interstitial brachytherapy at our institution from 2006 to 2022 were identified. Over time, HDR brachytherapy boost dose at our institution has been dose-escalated from 18.75 Gy in 5 fractions to 27.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Local control and survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare between groups. Formal tumor control probability (TCP) analysis was performed using logistic dose-response modeling.
214 patients were identified with median follow-up of 28.1 months (IQR 8.2-58.7). Total HDR dose correlated significantly with local and locoregional control when analyzed as a continuous variable, and when dichotomized around median dose of 25 Gy (p = 0.024). TCP analysis showed a dose-response effect between HR CTV D90 and local control in the entire cohort, and separately in cervical and vaginal cancer subsets. The actuarial 5-year incidence of grade 3 or worse toxicity was 6.1%, and there was no significant association between toxicity and total HDR dose or HR CTV D90.
In patient treated with twice-daily template-based interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic cancers brachytherapy dose correlates with local control with no significant association between brachytherapy dose and toxicity, thus suggesting room for dose-escalation.
妇科癌症中基于模板的组织间近距离放疗存在几个因素,包括肿瘤体积大、侵犯邻近器官或形成瘘管、剂量不均匀以及每日两次分割照射,这些因素会导致固有的剂量递增效应,可能增加毒性。本研究报告了在每日两次基于模板的组织间近距离放疗治疗中的单机构剂量递增经验,以证明肿瘤控制和毒性结果,并假设基于图像的计划下组织间近距离放疗的剂量递增是安全有效的。
确定了2006年至2022年在本机构接受基于模板的组织间近距离放疗的患者。随着时间的推移,本机构高剂量率近距离放疗的加强剂量已从5次分割的18.75 Gy递增至5次分割的27.5 Gy。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和对数秩检验分析局部控制和生存结果,以比较组间差异。使用逻辑剂量反应模型进行正式的肿瘤控制概率(TCP)分析。
确定了214例患者,中位随访时间为28.1个月(四分位间距8.2 - 58.7)。当将总高剂量率剂量作为连续变量分析时,以及在中位剂量25 Gy左右进行二分法分析时,其与局部和区域控制显著相关(p = 0.024)。TCP分析显示,在整个队列中,以及在宫颈癌和阴道癌亚组中,高危临床靶区(HR CTV)D90与局部控制之间存在剂量反应效应。3级或更严重毒性的5年精算发生率为6.1%,毒性与总高剂量率剂量或HR CTV D90之间无显著关联。
在接受每日两次基于模板的组织间近距离放疗治疗的妇科癌症患者中,近距离放疗剂量与局部控制相关,近距离放疗剂量与毒性之间无显著关联,因此提示有剂量递增的空间。