Suppr超能文献

验证一项针对大学生的阅读理解评估:初步研究结果。

Validating a Reading Comprehension Assessment for College Students: Preliminary Findings.

作者信息

Carlson Sarah E, Clinton-Lisell Virginia, Taylor Terrill, Ness-Maddox Heather, Dahl Amanda, Davison Mark L, Seipel Ben

机构信息

Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

Educational Foundations and Research, University of North Dakota, 231 Centennial Ave., Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 May 3;54(3):27. doi: 10.1007/s10936-025-10144-6.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate a novel reading comprehension assessment for college students named MOCCA-College. A random sample of college students (N = 63, average age of 22.5) were recruited from various education programs (e.g., first-year courses, TRIO, SONA) and completed MOCCA-College Online and were later recruited to complete face-to-face think-aloud and recall tasks, as well as standardized assessments such as the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT) and the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE-2). Based on the think-aloud findings, correct answers on MOCCA-College were associated with meaningful connections to background knowledge. Incorrect answers were associated with irrelevant connections to background knowledge that are not helpful for comprehension. Moreover, efficiency on MOCCA-College (seconds per correct answer) demonstrated criterion validity based on the NDRT and TOWRE-2. Future research and analyses may examine assessment development, particularly for identifying nuanced individual differences in college readers' comprehension.

摘要

本研究的目的是验证一种针对大学生的名为MOCCA-College的新型阅读理解评估方法。从各种教育项目(如一年级课程、TRIO、SONA)中随机抽取了一批大学生(N = 63,平均年龄22.5岁),他们完成了在线MOCCA-College测试,之后又被招募来完成面对面的出声思考和回忆任务,以及标准化评估,如纳尔逊-丹尼阅读测试(NDRT)和单词阅读效率测试(TOWRE-2)。基于出声思考的结果,MOCCA-College上的正确答案与对背景知识的有意义联系相关。错误答案与对背景知识的无关联系相关,这些联系对理解没有帮助。此外,基于NDRT和TOWRE-2,MOCCA-College的效率(每题正确答案所用时间)显示出效标效度。未来的研究和分析可能会考察评估发展,特别是用于识别大学读者理解方面细微的个体差异。

相似文献

3
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.针对说英语的阅读能力差的人进行的自然拼读法训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub2.
9
Reading aids for adults with low vision.针对视力低下成年人的阅读辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD003303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub4.

本文引用的文献

3
Is Retell a Valid Measure of Reading Comprehension?复述是阅读理解的有效衡量方式吗?
Educ Res Rev. 2021 Feb;32. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100375. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验