Chisaki Yugo, Nakamura Nobuhiko, Komuro Takako, Nyuji Hirokatsu, Harano Mai, Kitada Noriaki
Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, 5-Nakauchi-cho, Misasagi, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, 607-8414, Japan.
Clin Drug Investig. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s40261-025-01445-8.
Pembrolizumab has been approved for the immunotherapy of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on the KEYNOTE-355 trial. However, cost-effectiveness evidence is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for patients with PD-L1-positive inoperable or metastatic TNBC from a Japanese healthcare perspective.
The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for pembrolizumab, of which the drug price was determined at 214,498 Japanese yen (JPY), or 1631 US dollars (USD) (1 USD = 131.5 JPY) for KEYTRUDA (100 mg), using a partition survival model based on the KEYNOTE-355 trial subgroup analysis in Japan. The comparison was made using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA), which evaluate the impact of parameter uncertainty, were performed to assess the robustness and calculate the acceptable probability, defined as the probability of the ICER being below the willingness-to-pay (WTP).
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provided an additional 0.676 QALYs at an incremental cost of 8,503,072 JPY. The ICER for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy compared with conventional chemotherapy was 12,577,178 JPY (95,644 USD) per QALY. The ICER per QALY was below the willingness-to-pay threshold of 15,000,000 JPY. PSAs revealed that the acceptable probability was 83.9% at 15,000,000 JPY.
The pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective option compared with conventional chemotherapy for patients with PD-L1-positive inoperable or metastatic TNBC in a Japanese medical environment from a healthcare system.
基于KEYNOTE-355试验,帕博利珠单抗已被批准用于程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)阳性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的免疫治疗。然而,成本效益证据有限。本研究的目的是从日本医疗保健角度评估帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗相比,对PD-L1阳性不可切除或转移性TNBC患者的成本效益。
使用基于日本KEYNOTE-355试验亚组分析的分区生存模型,对帕博利珠单抗进行成本效益分析,其药物价格确定为每100mg可瑞达214,498日元(JPY),即1631美元(USD)(1美元 = 131.5日元)。使用质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)进行比较。进行单向确定性和概率敏感性分析(PSA)以评估参数不确定性的影响,从而评估稳健性并计算可接受概率,可接受概率定义为ICER低于支付意愿(WTP)的概率。
帕博利珠单抗联合化疗在增量成本为8,503,072日元的情况下,额外提供了0.676个QALY。与传统化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗的ICER为每QALY 12,577,178日元(95,644美元)。每QALY的ICER低于15,000,000日元的支付意愿阈值。PSA显示,在15,000,000日元时可接受概率为83.9%。
在日本医疗环境下,从医疗保健系统角度来看,对于PD-L1阳性不可切除或转移性TNBC患者,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与传统化疗相比可能是一种具有成本效益的选择。