Linsley Victoria G, Bishop Nicolette C, Roberts Matthew J, Hamrouni Malik, Demashkieh Mayada, Paine Nicola J
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and the University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Stress Health. 2025 Jun;41(3):e70038. doi: 10.1002/smi.70038.
Psychological stress, physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) are modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), possibly through altering one's inflammatory profile. The links between inflammatory responses to acute psychological stress and habitual moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels and SB volume is not clear. We explored the relationships in the magnitude of inflammatory responses to passive and active psychological stress with habitual MVPA and SB levels. Eighty-eight healthy participants completed this study. Habitual MVPA and SB volume were measured over 1 week using wearable devices. The main trial consisted of a baseline period, a 6-min passive (International Affective Picture System: IAPS) and an 8-min active stress task (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test: PASAT) with 45-min rest post-tasks. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured throughout the testing protocol. Blood samples were collected after each time point to measure circulating and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated interleukin-6 (IL-6), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and the neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR). There was a significant positive relationship between changes in HR during the IAPS and habitual SB (B = 1.061; p = 0.008). There were no relationships between the change in SBP or DBP during the IAPS and habitual SB (all p > 0.05). There were no relationships between acute psychological stress-induced circulating IL-6, LPS-stimulated IL-6, NLR or SIRI and habitual MVPA or SB levels. This is the first study to investigate passive psychological stress-induced responses in the context of SB and builds on previous work in relation to SB and inflammatory responses to active stress. We found no associations between the inflammatory response to a passive or active psychological stress task and SB or MVPA levels in healthy young adults, but since our participants were very lean (21.7% body fat), findings may differ in other populations.
心理压力、身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)是心血管疾病(CVD)的可改变风险因素,可能是通过改变个体的炎症特征来实现的。急性心理压力引发的炎症反应与习惯性中等强度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)水平及SB时长之间的联系尚不清楚。我们探讨了被动和主动心理压力引发的炎症反应程度与习惯性MVPA和SB水平之间的关系。88名健康参与者完成了本研究。使用可穿戴设备在1周内测量习惯性MVPA和SB时长。主要试验包括一个基线期、一项6分钟的被动应激任务(国际情感图片系统:IAPS)和一项8分钟的主动应激任务(听觉连续加法测试:PASAT),任务后休息45分钟。在整个测试过程中测量心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。在每个时间点后采集血样,以测量循环及脂多糖(LPS)刺激后的白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)。IAPS期间HR的变化与习惯性SB之间存在显著正相关(B = 1.061;p = 0.008)。IAPS期间SBP或DBP的变化与习惯性SB之间无相关性(所有p > 0.05)。急性心理压力诱导的循环IL-6、LPS刺激的IL-6、NLR或SIRI与习惯性MVPA或SB水平之间无相关性。这是第一项在SB背景下研究被动心理压力诱导反应的研究,它建立在先前关于SB及主动应激炎症反应的工作基础之上。我们发现,在健康的年轻成年人中,被动或主动心理应激任务引发的炎症反应与SB或MVPA水平之间无关联,但由于我们的参与者很瘦(体脂率为21.7%),其他人群的研究结果可能会有所不同。