Cusiter Jennie, Short Kate, Webb Annabel, Munro Natalie
The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Child Dev. 2025 Jul-Aug;96(4):1519-1545. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14252. Epub 2025 May 3.
This meta-analytic review explored the characteristics and effectiveness of combined language (e.g., vocabulary) and code (e.g., phonological awareness) interventions, including synergistic intervention effects for at-risk preschoolers. Data from 29 randomized controlled trials, published before March 2023, reporting on 43 interventions, including 9333 children (4-6 years; 55% male, 45% African American, 30% Hispanic) were included in the meta-analyses. Composite intervention effects were small: language (g = 0.11) and code (g = 0.23). Language and code outcomes were significantly related (p = 0.032). Interventions equally targeting code and language subskills produced equivalent or greater code and language outcomes than those with an unequal emphasis. Implications for future combined intervention studies are discussed.
这项荟萃分析综述探讨了语言(如词汇)和编码(如语音意识)联合干预的特点和效果,包括对有风险的学龄前儿童的协同干预效果。纳入了2023年3月之前发表的29项随机对照试验的数据,这些试验报告了43项干预措施,涉及9333名儿童(4至6岁;55%为男性,45%为非裔美国人,30%为西班牙裔),并进行了荟萃分析。综合干预效果较小:语言方面(g = 0.11)和编码方面(g = 0.23)。语言和编码结果显著相关(p = 0.032)。同等针对编码和语言子技能的干预措施比那些重点不均衡的干预措施产生了同等或更好的编码和语言结果。文中讨论了对未来联合干预研究的启示。