Burgdorf Julia G, Amjad Halima, Barrón Yolanda, Ryvicker Miriam
Center for Home Care Policy & Research, at VNS Health, New York, New York, USA.
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jul;73(7):2117-2126. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19491. Epub 2025 May 2.
Skilled home health (HH) is a critical source of clinical care for community-living older adults. One-third of HH patients have dementia, but poor information transfer may limit HH providers' awareness of dementia diagnosis. We determined the prevalence of undocumented dementia diagnosis among HH patients and associated care delivery patterns and clinical outcomes.
Among a 2018 national sample of Medicare HH patients, we compared those (1) without diagnosed dementia, (2) with dementia documented during HH, (3) with dementia undocumented during HH. Dementia diagnosis was determined from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File claims-based indicator and documentation was determined via HH clinical assessments (OASIS). We measured HH care delivery and outcomes from claims and assessment data. We fit multivariable negative binomial and logistic regression models to estimate associations of dementia status and documentation with outcomes, while adjusting for patient- and HH agency-level characteristics and clustering at the HH agency level.
Among 1,372,570 HH patients, 30% had diagnosed dementia. Among those with diagnosed dementia, most (69%) had this diagnosis go undocumented during HH. Compared to those with documented dementia, those with undocumented dementia had longer lengths of stay (+3.1 days; 95% CI: 6.4-7.1) and were more likely to receive physical therapy (aOR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.16-1.22) and less likely to receive social work (aOR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.80-0.84). Compared to those with documented dementia, those with undocumented dementia had higher odds of hospitalization (aOR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.17-1.24) and Emergency Department use (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.17) and lower odds of discharge to self-care (aOR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.86-0.90). Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses stratifying by cognitive symptom severity, functional impairment, clinical severity, and referral source.
Results suggest that HH providers often lack pertinent information regarding patients' dementia status, and patients with undocumented dementia more often experience acute care utilization.
专业的居家健康护理(HH)是社区老年人临床护理的重要来源。三分之一的HH患者患有痴呆症,但信息传递不畅可能会限制HH服务提供者对痴呆症诊断的认知。我们确定了HH患者中未记录的痴呆症诊断的患病率以及相关的护理模式和临床结果。
在2018年全国医疗保险HH患者样本中,我们比较了以下几类患者:(1)未被诊断为痴呆症的患者;(2)在HH期间被记录为患有痴呆症的患者;(3)在HH期间未被记录为患有痴呆症的患者。痴呆症诊断根据医疗保险受益人汇总文件中基于索赔的指标确定,记录通过HH临床评估(OASIS)确定。我们从索赔和评估数据中衡量HH护理的提供情况和结果。我们拟合了多变量负二项式和逻辑回归模型,以估计痴呆症状态和记录与结果之间的关联,同时调整患者和HH机构层面的特征,并在HH机构层面进行聚类分析。
在1372570名HH患者中,30%被诊断患有痴呆症。在那些被诊断患有痴呆症的患者中,大多数(69%)在HH期间未记录该诊断。与有记录的痴呆症患者相比,未记录的痴呆症患者住院时间更长(+3.1天;95%置信区间:6.4-7.1),接受物理治疗的可能性更大(调整后比值比:1.19;95%置信区间:1.16-1.22),接受社会工作的可能性更小(调整后比值比:0.82;95%置信区间:0.80-0.84)。与有记录的痴呆症患者相比,未记录的痴呆症患者住院(调整后比值比:1.20;95%置信区间:1.17-1.24)和使用急诊科(调整后比值比:1.14;95%置信区间:1.11-1.17)的几率更高,出院后自理的几率更低(调整后比值比:0.88;95%置信区间:0.86-0.90)。通过认知症状严重程度、功能损害、临床严重程度和转诊来源进行分层的敏感性分析结果稳健。
结果表明,HH服务提供者通常缺乏有关患者痴呆症状态的相关信息,未记录的痴呆症患者更常使用急性护理。