Burgdorf Julia G, Wolff Jennifer L, Barrón Yolanda, Amjad Halima
Center for Home Care Policy & Research at VNS Health, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Sep;26(9):105744. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105744. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
To investigate the relationship between unmet needs for family caregiver support, defined as lack of caregiver availability or capacity, and home health care (HH) service types delivered to patients with dementia.
Cross-sectional study of national claims and assessment data.
325,148 older adults (aged ≥65 years) with diagnosed dementia receiving Medicare-funded HH in 2018.
Service types were measured from Medicare claims and refers to patient receipt of each of 6 service types covered during HH: nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, social work, and personal care aide. We fit multivariable logistic regression models estimating the odds of receiving each service type as a function of unmet caregiving needs and patient and HH agency characteristics, while clustering at the HH agency level.
In adjusted models, lack of caregiver availability to help with medical, functional, or instrumental tasks was associated with higher odds of receiving skilled nursing [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.47-1.81], aide (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.54-1.68), and social work (aOR 2.71, 95% CI 2.56-2.86), respectively. Lack of caregiver capacity to help with medical, functional, or instrumental tasks was associated with higher odds of receiving skilled nursing (aOR 1.29, 95% CI1.20-1.39), physical therapy (aOR 1.74, 95% CI1.68-1.81), and social work (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.28), respectively.
We observed significant associations between unmet needs for caregiving support and HH service delivery for patients with dementia. Expanding HH quality measurement and risk adjustment data elements to include measures of caregiver availability and capacity are necessary steps toward supporting HH providers' efforts to meet patients' needs regardless of their caregiving context.
探讨家庭照护者支持未满足需求(定义为照护者可及性或能力不足)与为痴呆患者提供的家庭健康护理(HH)服务类型之间的关系。
对国家索赔和评估数据进行的横断面研究。
2018年325,148名年龄≥65岁且被诊断患有痴呆症并接受医疗保险资助的HH服务的老年人。
从医疗保险索赔中衡量服务类型,指患者接受HH期间涵盖的6种服务类型中的每一种:护理、物理治疗、职业治疗、言语治疗、社会工作和个人护理助理。我们拟合多变量逻辑回归模型,估计接受每种服务类型的几率,作为未满足照护需求以及患者和HH机构特征的函数,同时在HH机构层面进行聚类分析。
在调整后的模型中,缺乏帮助进行医疗、功能或工具性任务的照护者可及性,分别与接受专业护理(调整后优势比[aOR]1.63,95%置信区间[CI]1.47 - 1.81)、助理服务(aOR 1.61,95% CI 1.54 - 1.68)和社会工作(aOR 2.71,95% CI 2.56 - 2.86)的较高几率相关。缺乏帮助进行医疗、功能或工具性任务的照护者能力,分别与接受专业护理(aOR 1.29,95% CI 1.20 - 1.39)、物理治疗(aOR 1.74,95% CI 1.68 - 1.81)和社会工作(aOR 1.24,95% CI 1.17 - 1.28)的较高几率相关。
我们观察到痴呆患者照护支持未满足需求与HH服务提供之间存在显著关联。扩大HH质量测量和风险调整数据元素,以纳入照护者可及性和能力的测量,是支持HH提供者努力满足患者需求(无论其照护背景如何)的必要步骤。