Mohammadnia Niekbachsh, van Broekhoven Amber, Bax Willem A, Eikelboom John W, Mosterd Arend, Fiolet Aernoud T L, Tijssen Jan G P, Thompson Peter L, de Kleijn Dominique P V, Tsimikas Sotirios, Cornel Jan H, Yeang Calvin, El Messaoudi Saloua
Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Atherosclerosis. 2025 Jun;405:119211. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119211. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
There is a need for effective tools to stratify and modify cardiovascular risk associated with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids (OxPL). The objective of this analysis was to explore the modifying effects of low-grade inflammation on Lp(a)- and OxPL-associated risk in a secondary prevention cohort.
Levels of Lp(a), OxPL associated with apolipoprotein(a) (OxPL-apo[a]) and apolipoprotein B (OxPL-apoB) were determined in the placebo-arm of the low-dose colchicine 2 trial. Patients were between 35 and 82 years, had established chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), and were clinically stable for at least six months prior to randomization. The outcome was the incidence of the composite endpoint of spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization stratified by biomarker levels using a Cox regression model.
There was a significant interaction between Lp(a) and IL-6 <3.2 ng/L (median) and IL-6 ≥3.2 ng/L for the composite endpoint (HR 0.90; 95 %CI 0.78-1.03 vs HR 1.18; 95 %CI 1.01-1.39, P = 0.01). No interaction was found for Lp(a) levels in participants with hsCRP <2 mg/L (HR 1.00; 95 %CI 0.89-1.14) versus those with hsCRP ≥2 mg/L (HR 1.04; 95 %CI 0.86-1.25, P = 0.79). In line with Lp(a) levels, significant interaction was observed between OxPL-apo(a) as well as OxPL-apoB levels for the composite endpoint with IL-6 (P<0.01 and 0.03, respectively), but not for hsCRP.
In patients with CCS, Lp(a), OxPL-apo(a) and OxPL-apoB associated cardiovascular risk was only pertinent in those with elevated IL-6 but not hsCRP levels.
需要有效的工具来分层和改善与脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]升高及氧化磷脂(OxPL)相关的心血管风险。本分析的目的是在一个二级预防队列中探讨低度炎症对Lp(a)和OxPL相关风险的改善作用。
在低剂量秋水仙碱2试验的安慰剂组中测定Lp(a)、与载脂蛋白(a)(OxPL-apo[a])和载脂蛋白B(OxPL-apoB)相关的OxPL水平。患者年龄在35至82岁之间,患有确诊的慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS),并且在随机分组前临床稳定至少6个月。结局是使用Cox回归模型按生物标志物水平分层的自发性心肌梗死、缺血性中风或缺血驱动的冠状动脉血运重建复合终点的发生率。
对于复合终点,Lp(a)与IL-6<3.2 ng/L(中位数)和IL-6≥3.2 ng/L之间存在显著交互作用(HR 0.90;95%CI 0.78-1.03 vs HR 1.18;95%CI 1.01-1.39,P = 0.01)。在hsCRP<2 mg/L的参与者中,Lp(a)水平与hsCRP≥2 mg/L的参与者之间未发现交互作用(HR 1.00;95%CI 0.89-1.14)(HR 1.04;95%CI 0.86-1.25,P = 0.79)。与Lp(a)水平一致,OxPL-apo(a)以及OxPL-apoB水平与复合终点的IL-6之间观察到显著交互作用(分别为P<0.01和0.03),但与hsCRP无交互作用。
在CCS患者中,Lp(a)、OxPL-apo(a)和OxPL-apoB相关的心血管风险仅在IL-6升高而非hsCRP水平升高的患者中相关。