Suppr超能文献

耳廓离断的两期再植——采用传统方法进行

2-staged Reimplantation of an Amputated Pinna - Doing it the Old-Fashioned Way.

作者信息

Vishnoi Kanishk, Nagpure Prakash, Garg Deepika, Dhalla Lakshey

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi India.

Department of ENT-HN, MGIMS, Wardha, India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May;77(5):2177-2182. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05477-6. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

Abstract

Reimplantation of amputated pinna has been a complicated issue for otorhinolaryngologists and plastic surgeons. Many techniques have been describes which include microvascular reconstruction and non microvascular reconstruction which come with their own advantages and disadvantages. Some surgeons have described totally removing the skin and burying the cartilage in a subcutaneous pocket in the abdomen (1). Mladick et al. in 1971 describe the technique of post auricular pocket which is used in our case to achieve the reimplantation of the segment (2, 3). Pennington et al. pioneered the technique of microvascular anastomosis which was later carried forward by Kind et al. (4) Although isolated traumatic ear amputation is a rare occurrence and often happens alongside severe systemic or head injuries, which typically rule out re-implantation attempts. In the rare cases where reimplantation is pursued, microvascular ear reimplantation poses significant challenges due to the small size of the vessels and the common presence of an avulsion injury. The old techniques of implantation are favorable for specific cases for example where the procedure needs to be quick, where prolonged anticoagulation is contraindicated, where the chances of failure of microvascular surgery is high for example in smokers. Thus in the era of microvascular surgery the old fashioned way of post auricular skin pocket still posses useful and can be in the armamentarium of otorhinolaryngologists.

摘要

耳廓离断再植一直是耳鼻喉科医生和整形外科医生面临的复杂问题。已经描述了许多技术,包括微血管重建和非微血管重建,它们各有优缺点。一些外科医生描述了完全切除皮肤并将软骨埋入腹部皮下袋中的方法(1)。1971年,姆拉迪克等人描述了耳后袋技术,我们在本病例中使用该技术来实现节段再植(2,3)。彭宁顿等人开创了微血管吻合技术,该技术后来由金德等人进一步发展(4)。虽然孤立性创伤性耳离断很少见,且常与严重的全身或头部损伤同时发生,这通常排除了再植尝试。在极少数进行再植的情况下,由于血管细小且常伴有撕脱伤,微血管耳再植带来了重大挑战。传统的植入技术适用于特定情况,例如手术需要快速进行、禁忌长期抗凝、微血管手术失败几率高的情况(如吸烟者)。因此,在微血管手术时代,传统的耳后皮肤袋方法仍然有用,可作为耳鼻喉科医生的手段之一。

相似文献

1
2-staged Reimplantation of an Amputated Pinna - Doing it the Old-Fashioned Way.耳廓离断的两期再植——采用传统方法进行
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May;77(5):2177-2182. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05477-6. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Microsurgical replantation of an ear with no venous repair.未进行静脉修复的耳部显微外科再植术。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2010 Feb;44(1):64-5. doi: 10.3109/02844310701682931.
2
Reconstruction of the External Ear.外耳重建
Ann Surg. 1948 Aug;128(2):226-39.
3
Microvascular ear replantation.耳部微血管再植术
Clin Plast Surg. 2002 Apr;29(2):233-48, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0094-1298(01)00009-8.
5
[Subcutaneous preservation of an amputated auricle. Morphological changes].
Laryngorhinootologie. 2000 Apr;79(4):233-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8794.
6
Ear replantation without microsurgery.非显微外科技术的耳部再植术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Jun;99(7):1868-72. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199706000-00009.
9
[Reimplantation of the pinna of the mutilated ear].[残缺耳耳廓再植术]
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1972 May-Jun;93(5):241-56.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验