• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帆船活动:一种用于设计和评估卫生专业教育研究项目的互动式、视觉上引人入胜的方法。

The Sailboat Activity: An Interactive, Visually Engaging Approach to Design and Assess Health Profession Education Research Projects.

作者信息

Harz Dominique, Kesselheim Jennifer, Fischer Krisztina

机构信息

Instructor of Orthodontics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Designated Institutional Official, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

MedEdPORTAL. 2025 May 2;21:11520. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11520. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11520
PMID:40321785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12046060/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Limited guidance exists to engage health profession educators in designing and critically evaluating rigorous research projects. Traditional lectures are often insufficient for advancing educators' skills. By leveraging educational theories, we designed and implemented an interactive, learner-focused, reflective workshop-the Sailboat activity-offering educators an opportunity to evaluate their research plans and hone their research planning skills.

METHODS

Preworkshop, participants represented their research plan on a Sailboat diagram and completed a preworkshop survey assessing their confidence in designing a research project. During the 90-minute virtual workshop, participants discussed their projects in pairs, and developed Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound action plans. The group then reconvened to review two projects and reflect on the activity. Finally, participants completed a postworkshop survey.

RESULTS

Thirty-four educators from 17 diverse specialties participated in the 2021, 2022, and 2023 Sailboat workshops. Pre- and postworkshop survey response rates were high (>90%). Participants indicated that they found the workshop valuable, highlighting that it helped them refine their project plans and organize their thoughts while fostering peer interaction. Responses to open-ended questions revealed that the workshop enhanced participants' understanding of the importance of iterative research planning. We observed significant increases from pre- to postworkshop ( < .05) in participants' confidence regarding identifying project barriers, weaknesses, key elements, alignment, and subsequent steps.

DISCUSSION

The Sailboat activity is an effective, feasible opportunity for educators to critically appraise and refine Health Professions Education Research projects, even in virtual environments. It could be adapted for other academic environments and incorporated into existing curricula.

摘要

引言

在让健康职业教育工作者参与设计和批判性评估严谨的研究项目方面,可用的指导有限。传统讲座往往不足以提升教育工作者的技能。通过运用教育理论,我们设计并实施了一个互动式、以学习者为中心的反思性工作坊——帆船活动,为教育工作者提供评估其研究计划并磨练研究计划技能的机会。

方法

在工作坊前,参与者在帆船图上展示他们的研究计划,并完成一项工作坊前调查,评估他们对设计研究项目的信心。在90分钟的虚拟工作坊中,参与者成对讨论他们的项目,并制定具体、可衡量、可实现、相关、有时限的行动计划。然后小组重新集合,审查两个项目并反思该活动。最后,参与者完成工作坊后调查。

结果

来自17个不同专业的34名教育工作者参加了2021年、2022年和2023年的帆船工作坊。工作坊前和工作坊后的调查回复率很高(>90%)。参与者表示他们认为该工作坊很有价值,强调它帮助他们完善了项目计划,整理了思路,同时促进了同伴互动。对开放式问题的回复显示,该工作坊增强了参与者对迭代研究计划重要性的理解。我们观察到,从工作坊前到工作坊后,参与者在识别项目障碍、弱点、关键要素、一致性和后续步骤方面的信心有显著提高(<.05)。

讨论

帆船活动是教育工作者批判性评估和完善健康职业教育研究项目的有效且可行的机会,即使是在虚拟环境中。它可以适用于其他学术环境,并纳入现有课程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8054/12046060/5c8846995a50/mep_2374-8265.11520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8054/12046060/5c8846995a50/mep_2374-8265.11520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8054/12046060/5c8846995a50/mep_2374-8265.11520-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Sailboat Activity: An Interactive, Visually Engaging Approach to Design and Assess Health Profession Education Research Projects.帆船活动:一种用于设计和评估卫生专业教育研究项目的互动式、视觉上引人入胜的方法。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 May 2;21:11520. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11520. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring Educators' Perceptions and Experiences of Online Teaching to Foster Caring Profession Students' Development of Virtual Caring Skills: Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study.探索教育工作者对在线教学的认知与体验,以促进护理专业学生虚拟护理技能的发展:序列解释性混合方法研究
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jan 15;8:e64548. doi: 10.2196/64548.
3
Actively Teaching Active Teaching Techniques.积极教授主动教学技巧。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 31;9(4):SG1-SG12. doi: 10.21980/J8H94V. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Teaching Procedural Skills: Integrating Educational Theory Into Practice.教授操作技能:将教育理论融入实践
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Dec 11;20:11476. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11476. eCollection 2024.
6
Questioning Aid for Rich, Real-Time Discussion (QARRD): A Tool to Improve Critical Thinking in Clinical Settings.质疑辅助工具在丰富、实时讨论中的应用(QARRD):一种提高临床环境下批判性思维的工具。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Apr 1;17:11132. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11132.
7
Impacts of Educating for Equity Workshop on Addressing Social Barriers of Type 2 Diabetes With Indigenous Patients.公平教育工作坊对解决原住民2型糖尿病患者社会障碍的影响。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018 Winter;38(1):49-59. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000188.
8
Changing the Approach in Supporting and Advancing Underrepresented in Medicine (UIM) Medical Students.改变支持和推进医学领域代表性不足的学生(UIM)的方法。
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Sep 20;20:11438. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11438. eCollection 2024.
9
Asynchronous Technical Feedback: A Workshop for Training Surgical Instructors.异步技术反馈:外科教员培训工作坊
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Apr 25;21:11519. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11519. eCollection 2025.
10
Use of evidence in health professions education: Attitudes, practices, barriers and supports.在卫生专业教育中应用证据:态度、实践、障碍和支持。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1012-1022. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1605161. Epub 2019 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks to Health Professions Education Research: An Introductory Workshop.应用概念和理论框架于健康职业教育研究:入门工作坊。
MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Dec 2;18:11286. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11286. eCollection 2022.
2
Game-based Sprint retrospectives: multiple action research.基于游戏的敏捷回顾:多项行动研究
Empir Softw Eng. 2022;27(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10664-021-10043-z. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
On the Use and Value of Reporting Guidelines in Health Professions Education Research.报告指南在卫生专业教育研究中的应用与价值
Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1619-1622. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003666.
4
23 Questions to Guide the Writing of a Quantitative Medical Education Research Proposal.指导撰写定量医学教育研究提案的23个问题。
Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):164. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003660.
5
Conducting Quantitative Medical Education Research: From Design to Dissemination.开展定量医学教育研究:从设计到传播。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Mar;18(2):129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
6
Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors' Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review.首刀:对学术医学编辑不将稿件送出外部同行评审的原因分析。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):464-470. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001860.
7
Improving medical education research.改进医学教育研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2007 Fall;19(4):331-5. doi: 10.1080/10401330701542370.
8
Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.审稿人拒稿和录用稿件的原因:医学教育报告中的优点与不足
Acad Med. 2001 Sep;76(9):889-96. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200109000-00010.