• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于游戏的敏捷回顾:多项行动研究

Game-based Sprint retrospectives: multiple action research.

作者信息

Przybyłek Adam, Albecka Marta, Springer Olga, Kowalski Wojciech

机构信息

Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.

Dynatrace Sp. z o.o, Aleja Grunwaldzka 411, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland.

出版信息

Empir Softw Eng. 2022;27(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10664-021-10043-z. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10664-021-10043-z
PMID:34697534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8527976/
Abstract

In today's fast-paced world of rapid technological change, software development teams need to constantly revise their work practices. Not surprisingly, regular reflection on how to become more effective is perceived as one of the most important principles of Agile Software Development. Nevertheless, running an effective and enjoyable retrospective meeting is still a challenge in real environments. As reported by several studies, the Sprint Retrospective is an agile practice most likely to be implemented improperly or sacrificed when teams perform under pressure to deliver. To facilitate the implementation of the practice, some agile coaches have proposed to set up retrospective meetings in the form of retrospective games. However, there has been little research-based evidence to support the positive effects of retrospective games. Our aim is to investigate whether the adoption of retrospective games can improve retrospective meetings in general and lead to positive societal outcomes. In this paper, we report on an Action Research project in which we implemented six retrospective games in six Scrum teams that had experienced common retrospective problems. The received feedback indicates that the approach helped the teams to mitigate many of the "accidental difficulties" pertaining to the Sprint Retrospective, such as lack of structure, dullness, too many complaints, or unequal participation and made the meetings more productive to some degree. Moreover, depending on their individual preferences, different participants perceived different games as having a positive impact on their communication, motivation-and-involvement, and/or creativity, even though there were others, less numerous, who had an opposite view. The advantages and disadvantages of each game as well as eight lessons learned are presented in the paper.

摘要

在当今技术变革迅速的快节奏世界中,软件开发团队需要不断修订其工作方法。不足为奇的是,定期反思如何提高效率被视为敏捷软件开发最重要的原则之一。然而,在实际环境中,组织一场有效且令人愉快的回顾会议仍然是一项挑战。多项研究报告显示,当团队在交付压力下工作时, Sprint回顾会议是最有可能被不当实施或牺牲的敏捷实践。为了促进该实践的实施,一些敏捷教练提议以回顾游戏的形式组织回顾会议。然而,几乎没有基于研究的证据支持回顾游戏的积极效果。我们的目标是调查采用回顾游戏是否总体上能改进回顾会议并带来积极的社会成果。在本文中,我们报告了一个行动研究项目,在六个经历过常见回顾问题的Scrum团队中实施了六个回顾游戏。收到的反馈表明,该方法帮助团队缓解了许多与Sprint回顾会议相关的“意外困难”,例如缺乏结构、枯燥乏味、抱怨过多或参与不平等,并在一定程度上使会议更有成效。此外,根据个人偏好,不同的参与者认为不同的游戏对他们的沟通、积极性和参与度以及/或创造力有积极影响,尽管也有少数人持相反观点。本文介绍了每个游戏的优缺点以及八点经验教训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/83be9c729d0a/10664_2021_10043_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/0e3e2d0d0025/10664_2021_10043_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/5e68f27c3703/10664_2021_10043_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/b03420a46351/10664_2021_10043_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/1068e0f42620/10664_2021_10043_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/98c1d7655893/10664_2021_10043_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/83be9c729d0a/10664_2021_10043_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/0e3e2d0d0025/10664_2021_10043_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/5e68f27c3703/10664_2021_10043_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/b03420a46351/10664_2021_10043_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/1068e0f42620/10664_2021_10043_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/98c1d7655893/10664_2021_10043_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf5/8527976/83be9c729d0a/10664_2021_10043_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Game-based Sprint retrospectives: multiple action research.基于游戏的敏捷回顾:多项行动研究
Empir Softw Eng. 2022;27(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10664-021-10043-z. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
Adapting the scrum framework for agile project management in science: case study of a distributed research initiative.将Scrum框架应用于科学领域的敏捷项目管理:一项分布式研究计划的案例研究
Heliyon. 2019 Mar 29;5(3):e01447. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01447. eCollection 2019 Mar.
3
Adapting agile development practices for hyper-agile environments: lessons learned from a COVID-19 emergency response research project.为超敏捷环境调整敏捷开发实践:从一个COVID-19应急响应研究项目中汲取的经验教训。
Inf Technol Manag. 2022;23(3):193-211. doi: 10.1007/s10799-022-00370-y. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
4
Is Participatory Design Associated with the Effectiveness of Serious Digital Games for Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Meta-Analysis.参与式设计与促进健康生活方式的严肃数字游戏的有效性相关吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 29;18(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4444.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
6
The co.LAB Generic Framework for Collaborative Design of Serious Games: Development Study.严肃游戏协同设计的co.LAB通用框架:发展研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jul 2;9(3):e28674. doi: 10.2196/28674.
7
Serious Game Design and Clinical Improvement in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review.严肃游戏设计与物理康复中的临床改善:系统评价
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Sep 23;9(3):e20066. doi: 10.2196/20066.
8
Contribution of the co.LAB Framework to the Collaborative Design of Serious Games: Mixed Methods Validation Study.co.LAB框架对严肃游戏协同设计的贡献:混合方法验证研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Nov 24;9(4):e33144. doi: 10.2196/33144.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Are serious games too serious? Diffusion of wearable technologies and the creation of a diffusion of serious games model.严肃游戏是否过于严肃?可穿戴技术的传播与严肃游戏传播模型的创建。
Int J Inf Manage. 2021 Jun;58:102202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102202. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Sailboat Activity: An Interactive, Visually Engaging Approach to Design and Assess Health Profession Education Research Projects.帆船活动:一种用于设计和评估卫生专业教育研究项目的互动式、视觉上引人入胜的方法。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 May 2;21:11520. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11520. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative study of SPI success factors in global and in-house environment for large-scale software companies.大型软件公司在全球和内部环境中SPI成功因素的比较研究。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Nov 20;9:e1656. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1656. eCollection 2023.
3
Requests classification in the customer service area for software companies using machine learning and natural language processing.

本文引用的文献

1
What Good Are Positive Emotions?积极情绪有什么好处?
Rev Gen Psychol. 1998 Sep;2(3):300-319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.
2
Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making.群体判断与决策中的动机性信息处理
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Feb;12(1):22-49. doi: 10.1177/1088868307304092.
3
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
使用机器学习和自然语言处理对软件公司客户服务领域中的请求进行分类。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Mar 17;9:e1016. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1016. eCollection 2023.
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
4
How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups.群体如何影响思维:群体中创意生成的认知模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):186-213. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1.
5
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
6
Evaluating action research.
Age Ageing. 2000 Sep;29 Suppl 2:8-10. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ageing.a008104.