Aagaard Mikkel, Stage Andreas Kjær, Boje Møller Trine, Pedersen Steen B, Pedersen Charlotte Gjørup
Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 30;18:2401-2416. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S513370. eCollection 2025.
Despite well-documented factors influencing collaboration, healthcare providers' perspectives remain limited. These perspectives are key for understanding how they manage complex patient care effectively. This study explores hospital healthcare providers' views on multidisciplinary collaboration and their openness to an intervention for managing complex care in patients with diabetes and multiple chronic conditions.
An interview study. The Interpretive Description approach was employed as the research methodology, with Boundary Work as the analytical framework. Purposive sampling was utilised, with data consisting of 22 semi-structured, face-to-face individual and two focus group interviews with nurses, junior physicians, and physicians at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Three main themes emerged: Wide Support and Need for Multidisciplinary Collaboration; Existing Collaboration Between Clinics - and Their Limitations; and Introducing a Collaborative Initiative: the Intervention. The informants agreed that collaboration and coordination - both broadly and in relation to the specific intervention - are important and could improve care coordination, enhance patients' sense of security, clarify professional roles, enrich expertise, and streamline resource use. However, organisational structures and professional dynamics often hinder such efforts. A key challenge related to the intervention was identifying patients with complex cases for referral.
This study highlights hospital healthcare providers' recognition of the critical need to strengthen collaboration across specialties to manage complex cases effectively. Significant barriers, such as siloed specialisation and heavy workloads, call for targeted political and managerial action. Challenges in identifying complex cases point to the need for methods that adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach to gain a nuanced understanding of the challenges individuals face in living with multiple chronic conditions and receiving care across different hospital clinics. In the future, this approach could streamline the referral of complex cases, with additional research required to explore the potential of flexible multidisciplinary team meetings in enhancing collaboration within complex care pathways.
尽管有充分记录的影响合作的因素,但医疗保健提供者的观点仍然有限。这些观点对于理解他们如何有效管理复杂的患者护理至关重要。本研究探讨了医院医疗保健提供者对多学科合作的看法,以及他们对管理糖尿病和多种慢性病患者复杂护理干预措施的接受程度。
一项访谈研究。采用解释性描述方法作为研究方法,以边界工作为分析框架。采用目的抽样法,数据包括对丹麦奥胡斯大学医院的护士、初级医生和医生进行的22次半结构化、面对面的个人访谈和两次焦点小组访谈。
出现了三个主要主题:对多学科合作的广泛支持和需求;诊所之间现有的合作及其局限性;以及引入合作倡议:干预措施。受访者一致认为,广泛的合作与协调以及与具体干预措施相关的合作与协调都很重要,可以改善护理协调、增强患者的安全感、明确专业角色、丰富专业知识并优化资源利用。然而,组织结构和专业动态往往会阻碍这些努力。与干预措施相关的一个关键挑战是确定复杂病例的患者以便转诊。
本研究强调了医院医疗保健提供者认识到有效管理复杂病例必须加强跨专业合作的迫切需求。诸如专业化孤立和工作量繁重等重大障碍需要有针对性的政治和管理行动。确定复杂病例的挑战表明,需要采用整体的、以患者为中心的方法,以便对个人在患有多种慢性病并在不同医院诊所接受护理时所面临的挑战有细致入微的了解。未来,这种方法可以简化复杂病例的转诊,还需要进一步研究以探索灵活的多学科团队会议在加强复杂护理路径内合作方面的潜力。