• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[MSB-38] The Journey of Intracorporeal Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Patients: From HVAD to Heartmate 3.[MSB - 38] 小儿患者体内左心室辅助装置的发展历程:从HeartWare心室辅助装置到Heartmate 3
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2024 Dec 31;32(4 Suppl 2):064-64. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-38. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Widening care gap in VAD therapy.心脏辅助装置治疗中的护理差距扩大。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Dec;42(12):1710-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
Identifying patients at risk: multi-centre comparison of HeartMate 3 and HeartWare left ventricular assist devices.识别风险患者:HeartMate 3 和 HeartWare 左心室辅助设备的多中心比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):1656-1665. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14308. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Early Outcomes After Heart Transplantation in Recipients Bridged With a HeartMate 3 Device.心脏再移植受者使用 HeartMate 3 装置桥接后的早期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Aug;108(2):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.084. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
Do patients with the centrifugal flow HeartMate 3 or HeartWare left ventricular assist device have better outcomes compared to those with axial flow HeartMate II?与使用轴流HeartMate II的患者相比,使用离心流HeartMate 3或HeartWare左心室辅助装置的患者是否有更好的治疗效果?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):844-851. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz202.
6
Surgical Outcomes of Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Heartmate 3 versus Heartware Ventricular Assist Device.离心式连续血流植入式左心室辅助装置的手术结果:Heartmate 3与Heartware心室辅助装置对比
J Chest Surg. 2024 Mar 5;57(2):184-194. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.135. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
7
Use of Intracorporeal Durable LVAD Support in Children Using HVAD or HeartMate 3-A EUROMACS Analysis.在儿童中使用HVAD或HeartMate 3进行体内持久左心室辅助装置支持——一项欧洲机械循环辅助系统登记研究分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Aug 17;10(8):351. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10080351.
8
Comparing short-term outcome after implantation of the HeartWare® HVAD® and the Abbott® HeartMate 3®.比较HeartWare® HVAD®和雅培® HeartMate 3®植入后的短期结果。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):908-914. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12649. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Heartware ventricular assist device versus HeartMate II versus HeartMate III in advanced heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心力衰竭晚期患者使用Heartware心室辅助装置与HeartMate II及HeartMate III的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Aug 30;12:20503121241278226. doi: 10.1177/20503121241278226. eCollection 2024.
10
Outcomes in Patients With HeartMate3 Versus HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device Implanted as Destination Therapy.植入作为终末期治疗的 HeartMate3 与 HeartWare 心室辅助装置患者的结局。
Transplant Proc. 2022 May;54(4):1049-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.02.020. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

[MSB - 38] 小儿患者体内左心室辅助装置的发展历程:从HeartWare心室辅助装置到Heartmate 3

[MSB-38] The Journey of Intracorporeal Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Pediatric Patients: From HVAD to Heartmate 3.

作者信息

Karaca Sedat, Kahraman Ümit, Tuncer Osman Nuri, Erdinli Dilek, Engin Çağatay, Yağdı Tahir, Atay Yüksel, Özbaran Mustafa

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2024 Dec 31;32(4 Suppl 2):064-64. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-38. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-38
PMID:40322189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12045175/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of HVAD (Heartware Ventricular Assist Device) and HeartMate 3 (HM3) used as a bridge to transplantation in end-stage heart failure.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 34 patients under 18 years of age who underwent HVAD (n=22; 13 females, 9 males; mean age: 12.7 years) or HM3 (n=12; 8 females, 4 males; mean age: 12.9 years) implantation at a single center between 2012 and 2024. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess survival.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the HVAD and HM3 groups in terms of age (p=0.78), weight (44.3 37.7 kg, p=0.25), height (155.6 151.5 cm, p= 0.49), body surface area (1.92 1.76 m, p=0.29), and sex (p=0.66). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was higher in the HM3 group (59 78.5 min, p<0.05). The average support duration was 899 days. Postoperative complications showed no statistically significant differences in infection (n=5 n=2, p=0.68) and cerebrovascular accidents (n=4 n=0, p=0.11) between the HVAD and HM3 groups, while pump thrombosis showed a statistically significant difference (n=8 n=0, p<0.05). During the five-year follow-up, nine patients underwent heart transplantation, 17 patients were on device followup, and eight patients died (seven patients with HVAD and 1 patient with HM3; p=0.12).

CONCLUSION

HeartMate 3 represents an outstanding option for pediatric patients due to its low complication rates and high survival rates. Further research is needed to develop an intracorporeal device suitable for implantation in neonates and infants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较Heartware心室辅助装置(HVAD)和HeartMate 3(HM3)作为终末期心力衰竭患者移植桥梁的效果。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2012年至2024年间在单一中心接受HVAD植入(n = 22;13名女性,9名男性;平均年龄:12.7岁)或HM3植入(n = 12;8名女性,4名男性;平均年龄:12.9岁)的34例18岁以下患者。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估生存率。

结果

HVAD组和HM3组在年龄(p = 0.78)、体重(44.3±37.7 kg,p = 0.25)、身高(155.6±151.5 cm,p = 0.49)、体表面积(1.92±1.76 m²,p = 0.29)和性别(p = 0.66)方面无显著差异。HM3组的平均体外循环时间更长(59±78.5分钟,p<0.05)。平均支持时间为899天。HVAD组和HM3组术后并发症在感染(n = 5 vs n = 2,p = 0.68)和脑血管意外(n = 4 vs n = 0,p = 0.11)方面无统计学显著差异,而泵血栓形成有统计学显著差异(n = 8 vs n = 0,p<0.05)。在五年随访期间,9例患者接受了心脏移植,17例患者接受装置随访,8例患者死亡(7例HVAD患者和1例HM3患者;p = 0.12)。

结论

由于并发症发生率低和生存率高,HeartMate 3是儿科患者的一个优秀选择。需要进一步研究开发适合新生儿和婴儿植入的体内装置。