Prieto Peter A, Ferris Laura K, Guenther Michael J
University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, U.S.A.
Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2025 May 3;5(3):261-267. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10438. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (CM) recommend avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) when the positivity risk is <5%, considering SLNB when the risk is 5-10%, or offering SLNB when the risk is >10%. Most patients undergoing SLNB have a negative result, showing that reliance upon the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage alone results in most patients undergoing an unnecessary, negative, unreliable, invasive procedure.
Two gene expression profile (GEP) tests, the CP-GEP and the 31-GEP, have been developed to identify patients at low risk of SLN positivity who may consider avoiding SLNB. We analyzed the accuracy of the CP-GEP and 31-GEP in identifying patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity across the five validation studies of the CP-GEP and four validation studies of the 31-GEP in T1-T2 tumors.
Patients considered low risk by the CP-GEP had an SLN positivity rate of 6.2%, higher than the risk threshold of 5% used by the NCCN to guide SLNB decisions. In contrast, patients considered low risk by the 31-GEP or i31-SLNB had a 2.8% SLN positivity rate, a substantial improvement over AJCC-staging guidance.
Overall, the CP-GEP did not perform as well as AJCC, while the 31-GEP performed better than AJCC.
背景/目的:美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)指南建议,当前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)阳性风险<5%时避免进行该检查;风险为5 - 10%时考虑进行SLNB;风险>10%时则进行SLNB。大多数接受SLNB的患者结果为阴性,这表明仅依靠美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的T分期会导致大多数患者接受不必要、阴性、不可靠的侵入性检查。
已开发出两种基因表达谱(GEP)检测方法,即CP-GEP和31-GEP,用于识别前哨淋巴结阳性风险较低、可能考虑避免进行SLNB的患者。我们在CP-GEP的五项验证研究以及31-GEP针对T1 - T2肿瘤的四项验证研究中,分析了CP-GEP和31-GEP在识别前哨淋巴结阳性风险<5%患者方面的准确性。
CP-GEP判定为低风险的患者前哨淋巴结阳性率为6.2%,高于NCCN用于指导SLNB决策的5%风险阈值。相比之下,31-GEP或i31-SLNB判定为低风险的患者前哨淋巴结阳性率为2.8%,相较于AJCC分期指导有显著改善。
总体而言,CP-GEP的表现不如AJCC,而31-GEP的表现优于AJCC。