Suppr超能文献

比较两种基因表达谱检测与识别前哨淋巴结阳性低风险皮肤黑色素瘤患者的标准治疗方法。

Comparing Two Gene Expression Profile Tests to Standard of Care for Identifying Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma at Low Risk of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.

作者信息

Prieto Peter A, Ferris Laura K, Guenther Michael J

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, U.S.A.

Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.

出版信息

Cancer Diagn Progn. 2025 May 3;5(3):261-267. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10438. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (CM) recommend avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) when the positivity risk is <5%, considering SLNB when the risk is 5-10%, or offering SLNB when the risk is >10%. Most patients undergoing SLNB have a negative result, showing that reliance upon the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage alone results in most patients undergoing an unnecessary, negative, unreliable, invasive procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two gene expression profile (GEP) tests, the CP-GEP and the 31-GEP, have been developed to identify patients at low risk of SLN positivity who may consider avoiding SLNB. We analyzed the accuracy of the CP-GEP and 31-GEP in identifying patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity across the five validation studies of the CP-GEP and four validation studies of the 31-GEP in T1-T2 tumors.

RESULTS

Patients considered low risk by the CP-GEP had an SLN positivity rate of 6.2%, higher than the risk threshold of 5% used by the NCCN to guide SLNB decisions. In contrast, patients considered low risk by the 31-GEP or i31-SLNB had a 2.8% SLN positivity rate, a substantial improvement over AJCC-staging guidance.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the CP-GEP did not perform as well as AJCC, while the 31-GEP performed better than AJCC.

摘要

背景/目的:美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)指南建议,当前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)阳性风险<5%时避免进行该检查;风险为5 - 10%时考虑进行SLNB;风险>10%时则进行SLNB。大多数接受SLNB的患者结果为阴性,这表明仅依靠美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的T分期会导致大多数患者接受不必要、阴性、不可靠的侵入性检查。

材料与方法

已开发出两种基因表达谱(GEP)检测方法,即CP-GEP和31-GEP,用于识别前哨淋巴结阳性风险较低、可能考虑避免进行SLNB的患者。我们在CP-GEP的五项验证研究以及31-GEP针对T1 - T2肿瘤的四项验证研究中,分析了CP-GEP和31-GEP在识别前哨淋巴结阳性风险<5%患者方面的准确性。

结果

CP-GEP判定为低风险的患者前哨淋巴结阳性率为6.2%,高于NCCN用于指导SLNB决策的5%风险阈值。相比之下,31-GEP或i31-SLNB判定为低风险的患者前哨淋巴结阳性率为2.8%,相较于AJCC分期指导有显著改善。

结论

总体而言,CP-GEP的表现不如AJCC,而31-GEP的表现优于AJCC。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Clinical Utility of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Nomograms.黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检列线图的临床应用
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jan 1;238(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000886. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验