Suppr超能文献

分剂量口服硫酸盐溶液与分剂量聚乙二醇以及单剂量聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项前瞻性随机研究

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerance of Split Dose Oral Sulfate Solution Versus Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Versus Single Dose Polyethylene Glycol for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study.

作者信息

Zacharia George Sarin, Thomas Varghese

机构信息

BronxCare Health System, Bronx, USA & Ahalia Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Malabar Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Calicut, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Middle East J Dig Dis. 2025 Jan;17(1):12-18. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2025.403. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quality of bowel preparation is one of the key determinants of a successful colonoscopy. Bowel preparation regimens have evolved greatly over the past few decades, with attempts to improve the efficiency and tolerability; still an ideal agent or regimen continues to be oblivious. To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of three bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy: split dose of oral sulfate solution (OSS), split dose of polyethylene glycol (PEG), and same-day single dose PEG.

METHODS

This study was a randomized, single-blind control design with three study groups. Group A received a split dose of OSS, group B received a split dose of PEG, and Group C received a single dose of PEG for bowel preparation. The quality of preparation was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and the adverse effects and tolerance were noted. The data were compared statistically for any significant difference between the regimens.

RESULTS

Mean total BBPS scores were 8.08, 7.52, and 7.92 for groups A, B, and C, respectively (=0.076). Segmental BBPS scores were statistically similar for the right and transverse colon but differed for the left colon (A: B: C=2.79: 2.54: 2.75; <0.01). Gastrointestinal side effects and electrolyte disturbances were similar across the three groups. Split-dose preparations were associated with more significant sleep disturbances than single-dose PEG (<0.001). Patients who received OSS reported more taste intolerance (<0.01), while those who received single PEG reported more volume intolerance (<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Split-dose OSS, split-dose PEG, and single-dose PEG regimens provide adequate and comparable bowel preparation for colonoscopy with good patient tolerance and no significant adverse effects. Overnight PEG and OSS preparations were associated with more substantial sleep disturbances. OSS is associated with more taste intolerance, while single PEG is associated with more volume intolerance.

摘要

背景

肠道准备质量是结肠镜检查成功的关键决定因素之一。在过去几十年中,肠道准备方案有了很大发展,旨在提高效率和耐受性;然而,理想的药物或方案仍不明确。比较三种结肠镜检查肠道准备方案的疗效、安全性和耐受性:口服硫酸盐溶液(OSS)分剂量给药、聚乙二醇(PEG)分剂量给药和同日单剂量PEG。

方法

本研究为随机、单盲对照设计,分为三个研究组。A组接受OSS分剂量给药,B组接受PEG分剂量给药,C组接受单剂量PEG进行肠道准备。使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估准备质量,并记录不良反应和耐受性。对数据进行统计学比较,以确定各方案之间是否存在显著差异。

结果

A、B、C组的平均总BBPS评分分别为8.08、7.52和7.92(=0.076)。右半结肠和横结肠的节段性BBPS评分在统计学上相似,但左半结肠不同(A:B:C = 2.79:2.54:2.75;<0.01)。三组的胃肠道副作用和电解质紊乱相似。分剂量制剂比单剂量PEG导致更明显的睡眠障碍(<0.001)。接受OSS的患者报告更多味觉不耐受(<0.01),而接受单剂量PEG的患者报告更多容量不耐受(<0.001)。

结论

分剂量OSS、分剂量PEG和单剂量PEG方案为结肠镜检查提供了充分且可比的肠道准备,患者耐受性良好,无明显不良反应。过夜PEG和OSS制剂与更严重的睡眠障碍有关。OSS与更多味觉不耐受有关,而单剂量PEG与更多容量不耐受有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad14/12048835/330d2400b4d8/mejdd-17-12-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验