• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。

Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.

作者信息

Jung Yunho, Kim Hyun Gun, Yang Dong-Hoon, Kang Hyoun Woo, Park Jae Jun, Baek Dong Hoon, Chun Jaeyoung, Gweon Tae-Geun, Goong Hyeon Jeong, Kwak Min Seob, Lee Hyun Jung, Park Soo-Kyung, Lee Jong Hoon

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301
PMID:39688329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11650332/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC).

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens.

RESULTS

The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups. The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005017.

摘要

背景

口服硫酸片剂(OSTs)是一种将口服硫酸盐溶液和西甲硅油结合的肠道准备剂。本研究比较了OST与2升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸(2 L-PEG/ASC)的疗效、耐受性和安全性。

方法

这项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲、多中心、非劣效性试验纳入了2020年5月至2022年9月期间在13家大学医院接受结肠镜检查的211名健康成年人。使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)和哈雷菲尔德清洁量表(HCS)评估肠道清洁率,且准备剂采用分阶段给药方案。

结果

在BBPS上,OST组的总BBPS评分(8.2±1.5 vs. 7.8±1.4,P = 0.040)以及右半结肠(73.2% vs. 50.5%)、横结肠(80.6% vs. 68.0%)和左半结肠(81.5% vs. 67.0%)的高质量肠道清洁率均显著高于2 L-PEG/ASC组。然而,两组根据BBPS(90.7% vs. 91.2%)和HCS(96.3% vs. 94.2%)的成功清洁率无显著差异。与2 L-PEG/ASC组相比,OST组准备剂的味道、服用便利性和服用量;以及愿意使用相同制剂再次进行结肠镜检查的比例(89.8% vs. 78.6%,P = 0.026)均显著更好。两组之间的不良事件和具有临床意义的实验室变化无显著差异。

结论

在肠道清洁疗效方面,OST不劣于2 L-PEG/ASC,且在用于结肠镜检查的肠道准备时显示出更好的耐受性。

试验注册

临床研究信息服务标识符:KCT0005017。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/38c2948e9c0b/jkms-39-e301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/fa0aa812260e/jkms-39-e301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/3fb77c89f9cd/jkms-39-e301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/38c2948e9c0b/jkms-39-e301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/fa0aa812260e/jkms-39-e301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/3fb77c89f9cd/jkms-39-e301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/882b/11650332/38c2948e9c0b/jkms-39-e301-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.
2
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
3
Acute Gastropathy Associated with Bowel Preparation According to Age: Oral Sulfate Tablets versus 1-L Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid.根据年龄与肠道准备相关的急性胃病:口服硫酸盐片与含维生素 C 的 1L 聚乙二醇。
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 25;84(4):177-187. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2024.094.
4
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
5
Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Safety of 1 L vs 2 L Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.1 L 与 2 L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 行结肠镜肠道准备的效果和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 1;14(3):e00532. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532.
6
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study.口服硫酸盐片用于炎症性肠病患者肠道准备的有效性、安全性和耐受性:一项多中心随机对照研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1706-1713. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac080.
7
Efficacy of mosapride citrate with a split dose of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.枸橼酸莫沙必利分剂量联合聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸用于老年患者肠道准备的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18702. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018702.
8
Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study.结肠镜检查前极低容量准备的效果:一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1950-1961. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1950.
9
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid and an Oral Sulfate Solution in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Trial.聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸与口服硫酸盐溶液分阶段肠道准备效果的比较评估:一项随机、多中心III期临床试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000759.
10
Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.口服硫酸盐溶液与 2L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸分次服用在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):e431-e437. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001137.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.口服硫酸溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03885-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Screening and surveillance for hereditary colorectal cancer.遗传性结直肠癌的筛查与监测
Intest Res. 2024 Apr;22(2):119-130. doi: 10.5217/ir.2023.00112. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition.
韩国息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:2022年修订版
Intest Res. 2023 Jan;21(1):20-42. doi: 10.5217/ir.2022.00096. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate.口服硫酸片剂用于肠道准备及腺瘤检出率的疗效
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;38(3):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer.早期结直肠癌的内镜诊断与治疗
Intest Res. 2022 Jul;20(3):281-290. doi: 10.5217/ir.2021.00169. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
6
Post-polypectomy surveillance: the present and the future.息肉切除术后监测:现状与未来。
Clin Endosc. 2022 Jul;55(4):489-495. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.097. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
8
Improving the tolerability and safety of 1-L polyethylene glycol plus low-dose ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in a healthy population: a randomized multicenter clinical trial.提高健康人群中 1-L 聚乙二醇加低剂量抗坏血酸用于肠道准备的耐受性和安全性:一项随机多中心临床试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):341-350.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
Efficacy and Safety of TJP-008 Compared to 2 L PEG with Ascorbate in Colon Cleansing: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial.TJP-008 与含维生素 C 的 2L PEG 在结肠清洁中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机 3 期试验。
Gut Liver. 2022 Mar 15;16(2):259-268. doi: 10.5009/gnl210092.
10
Oral sulfate solution versus low-volume polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服硫酸盐溶液与低容量聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 May;34(4):721-728. doi: 10.1111/den.14194. Epub 2021 Dec 13.