Alveyn Edward, Coalwood Callum, Farrell Gráinne, Jackson Ella, Adas Maryam A, Norton Sam, Lanyon Peter, Price Elizabeth, Ledingham Joanna M, Galloway James B, Russell Mark D
Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Rheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Sep 1;64(9):4957-4967. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf233.
Considerable data support early treatment of RA to obtain disease remission. Data from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) in England and Wales suggest that, despite recent improvements in referral-to-treatment times, remission rates remain unchanged. We investigated reasons for this disconnect by evaluating temporal trends, geographical variation and predictors of remission in individuals with new RA diagnoses.
An observational cohort study of individuals with RA was conducted using data from NEIAA (May 2018-April 2024). Temporal and geographical variation in remission rates (DAS28 < 2.6) were explored using interrupted time-series and case-mix-adjusted mixed-effects regression. Predictors of remission were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
13 752 of 21 904 (62.8%) individuals with RA had data on DAS28 at 3 months after initial rheumatology assessment, of whom 4764 (34.6%) achieved remission. National remission rates were stable from 2018 to 2024; however, wide geographical variation was observed, ranging from 28.4% (London) to 40.3% (East of England). Threefold differences in remission rates were seen between individual hospitals within regions. Younger age, female sex, Black ethnicity, higher baseline DAS28, delayed DMARD initiation and longer symptom duration were independently associated with reduced odds of remission. Delays between symptom onset and referral have increased since the COVID-19 pandemic.
While national remission rates for early RA have remained stable in England and Wales since 2018, there is marked regional and hospital-level variation, highlighting ongoing inequities in service delivery. Addressing factors beyond referral-to-treatment time-particularly delayed presentation to primary care-is required to improve remission rates.
大量数据支持类风湿关节炎(RA)的早期治疗以实现疾病缓解。来自英格兰和威尔士国家早期炎症性关节炎审计(NEIAA)的数据表明,尽管近期在转诊至治疗的时间方面有所改善,但缓解率仍未改变。我们通过评估新诊断为RA的个体的时间趋势、地理差异和缓解预测因素来调查这种脱节的原因。
利用NEIAA(2018年5月至2024年4月)的数据对RA患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。使用中断时间序列和病例组合调整的混合效应回归来探索缓解率(疾病活动度评分28 [DAS28]<2.6)的时间和地理差异。使用多变量逻辑回归评估缓解的预测因素。
21904例RA患者中有13752例(62.8%)在初次风湿病评估后3个月有DAS28数据,其中4764例(34.6%)实现缓解。2018年至2024年全国缓解率稳定;然而,观察到地理差异很大,从28.4%(伦敦)到40.3%(英格兰东部)。各地区内个别医院之间的缓解率存在三倍差异。年龄较小、女性、黑人种族、基线DAS28较高、DMARD起始延迟和症状持续时间较长与缓解几率降低独立相关。自新冠疫情以来,症状出现与转诊之间的延迟有所增加。
自2018年以来,英格兰和威尔士早期RA的全国缓解率保持稳定,但存在明显的地区和医院层面差异,突出了服务提供方面持续存在的不公平现象。需要解决转诊至治疗时间之外的因素,特别是初级保健就诊延迟问题,以提高缓解率。