Toledo-Vargas Marcelo, Chong Kar Hau, Maddren Claudia I, Howard Steven J, Wakefield Bradley, Okely Anthony D
School of Social Sciences, Early Start, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Education, Early Start, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0682.
Parental technology use in a child's presence (hereafter, PTU), often referred to as technoference, is a growing concern in family dynamics, and no studies have quantitatively synthesized associations with children's health and development.
To systematically review and synthesize literature on associations between PTU in their child's presence and motor development, cognitive development, psychosocial health, physical activity, screen time, and sleep in early childhood.
Peer-reviewed studies from MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest published from inception to July 2024.
A total of 6212 studies were initially identified. Studies were included if they examined associations between PTU in the presence of their apparently healthy children (birth to age 4.9 years) and motor development, cognitive development, psychosocial health, physical activity, screen time, or sleep.
PRISMA guidelines were followed. Random-effect models were conducted to determine the pooled estimates of the associations and moderating effects of the type of exposure (distraction/interruption). The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools.
Association between PTU in the child's presence and motor development, cognitive development, psychosocial health, physical activity, screen time, and sleep.
Twenty-one studies involving 14 900 participants from 10 countries were included in the meta-analysis. Significant associations were found between parental technology use in the child's presence and cognition (r = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.04), internalizing behavior and emotions (r = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.19), externalizing behavior (r = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.21), prosocial behavior (r = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02), attachment (r = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.01), and screen time (r = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.32). No moderating effects of the type of PTU exposure on any associations were found. No study examined motor development, physical activity, or sleep.
Parents' use of technology in their child's presence was negatively associated with cognitive and psychosocial outcomes and screen time among young children, although the effect sizes were small. Further research focusing on potential impacts on physical activity, sleep, and motor skills is needed. Understanding these associations is crucial for informing research and guidelines aimed at minimizing the potential negative effects of this phenomenon on early childhood development.
父母在孩子面前使用科技产品(以下简称PTU),通常被称为科技干扰,这在家庭动态中日益引起关注,且尚无研究对其与儿童健康和发展的关联进行定量综合分析。
系统回顾并综合有关父母在孩子面前使用科技产品与幼儿运动发育、认知发育、心理社会健康、身体活动、屏幕使用时间和睡眠之间关联的文献。
从创刊至2024年7月在MEDLINE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、PsycINFO、PsycArticles、科学网、Scopus和ProQuest上发表的同行评审研究。
最初识别出6212项研究。纳入的研究需考察在表面健康的孩子(出生至4.9岁)面前父母使用科技产品与运动发育、认知发育、心理社会健康、身体活动、屏幕使用时间或睡眠之间的关联。
遵循PRISMA指南。采用随机效应模型确定关联的合并估计值以及暴露类型(分心/干扰)的调节效应。使用JBI批判性评价工具评估偏倚风险。
孩子面前父母使用科技产品与运动发育、认知发育、心理社会健康、身体活动、屏幕使用时间和睡眠之间的关联。
荟萃分析纳入了来自10个国家的21项研究,共14900名参与者。发现父母在孩子面前使用科技产品与认知(r = -0.14;95%CI,-0.23至-0.04)、内化行为和情绪(r = 0.13;95%CI,0.08至0.19)、外化行为(r = 0.15;95%CI,0.09至0.21)、亲社会行为(r = -0.08;95%CI,-0.13至-0.02)、依恋(r = -0.10;95%CI,-0.19至-0.01)以及屏幕使用时间(r = 0.23;95%CI,0.13至0.32)之间存在显著关联。未发现PTU暴露类型对任何关联有调节作用。没有研究考察运动发育、身体活动或睡眠。
父母在孩子面前使用科技产品与幼儿的认知和心理社会结局以及屏幕使用时间呈负相关,尽管效应量较小。需要进一步研究关注其对身体活动、睡眠和运动技能的潜在影响。了解这些关联对于为旨在尽量减少这一现象对幼儿发育潜在负面影响的研究和指南提供信息至关重要。