Zhang Jinghui, Zhang Qing, Xiao Bowen, Cao Yuxuan, Chen Yu, Li Yan
Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Psychology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 22;27:e57636. doi: 10.2196/57636.
Parental technoference, the interruption of parent-child interactions by technology, has been associated with negative outcomes in children's media use. However, the magnitude of this relationship and its moderating factors remain unclear.
This study aims to systematically examine the relationship between parental technoference and child problematic media use, as well as to identify moderating factors such as age, parental technoference group, study design, and type of problematic media use.
Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024 across multiple databases, including Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed, PsycINFO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, using predefined search strings. A total of 53 studies with a total of 60,555 participants (mean age of 13.84, SD 1.18 years) were included. Inclusion criteria comprised studies involving children under the age of 22 years, assessing the association between parental technoference and child problematic media use with valid measures, and reporting necessary statistical data. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing on other child outcomes, having sample sizes <30, or being case reports or review papers. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R (version 4.2.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with the meta and metafor packages to evaluate the association and conduct moderator analyses.
The meta-analysis identified a significant positive association between parental technoference and child problematic media use (r=0.296, 95% CI 0.259-0.331). Moderator analyses revealed that both parental technoference group (P<.001) and study design (P=.008) significantly influenced this relationship. Specifically, the association was stronger when both parents engaged in technoference compared to when only 1 parent did, and in cross-sectional studies compared to longitudinal studies. Age, gender, publication status, and type of problematic media use did not significantly moderate the relationship (all P>.05).
This meta-analysis provides robust evidence of the association between parental technoference and child problematic media use. The findings highlight the need for family-based interventions and underscore the importance of longitudinal research to understand the temporal dynamics of this relationship better.
PROSPERO CRD42023471997; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=471997.
父母的科技干扰,即科技对亲子互动的干扰,与儿童媒体使用的负面结果有关。然而,这种关系的强度及其调节因素仍不明确。
本研究旨在系统地考察父母的科技干扰与儿童问题性媒体使用之间的关系,并确定调节因素,如年龄、父母科技干扰组、研究设计和问题性媒体使用类型。
按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,截至2024年8月,在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括科学网、EBSCO、ProQuest、PubMed、PsycINFO和中国知网,使用预定义的检索词。共纳入53项研究,总计60555名参与者(平均年龄13.84岁,标准差1.18岁)。纳入标准包括涉及22岁以下儿童的研究,用有效测量方法评估父母的科技干扰与儿童问题性媒体使用之间的关联,并报告必要的统计数据。排除标准包括关注其他儿童结果的研究、样本量<30的研究,或病例报告或综述论文。使用观察性队列和横断面研究的质量评估工具评估偏倚风险。使用R(版本4.2.1;R统计计算基金会)和meta及metafor软件包进行随机效应Meta分析,以评估关联并进行调节分析。
Meta分析确定父母的科技干扰与儿童问题性媒体使用之间存在显著的正相关(r = 0.296,95%CI 0.259 - 0.331)。调节分析显示,父母科技干扰组(P <.001)和研究设计(P =.008)均对这种关系有显著影响。具体而言,与只有一方父母进行科技干扰相比,父母双方都进行科技干扰时的关联更强;与纵向研究相比,横断面研究中的关联更强。年龄、性别、发表状态和问题性媒体使用类型对这种关系没有显著的调节作用(所有P >.05)。
这项Meta分析为父母的科技干扰与儿童问题性媒体使用之间存在关联提供了有力证据。研究结果强调了基于家庭的干预措施的必要性,并突出了纵向研究对于更好地理解这种关系的时间动态的重要性。
PROSPERO CRD42023471997;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=471997