Havlik John L, Ghomi Reza H, An Na, Budhiraja Puneet, Arzubi Eric R
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Frontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258558. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8558.
Evidence of cost savings attributable to indicated and timely care remain rare in psychiatry. Interventions to provide evidence-based psychiatric care to Medicaid patients that lower total costs of care are particularly challenging.
To investigate Medicaid costs and care outcomes associated with use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicaid patients using and not using the services of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic (Frontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana) in 2022. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2024.
Receipt of care through an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.
Differences in Medicaid costs and cost subtypes between telepsychiatry patients and controls were assessed. Quality metrics, including inpatient hospitalizations, hospital readmissions, and admissions from the emergency department, were also compared.
In total, there were 2686 patients using the outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 30.55 [14.67] years) and 2686 propensity-matched controls (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 31.37 [15.92] years). Across categories examined, the telepsychiatry patients had care costs per member per month (PMPM) similar to those for propensity-matched control patients ($685.5 [95% CI, $632.9-$738.2] vs $734.0 [95% CI, $645.7-$822.3]; P = .10) over the study period. PMPM costs to Medicaid from the telepsychiatry clinic's patients were higher for professional services vs control patients ($464.0 [95% CI, $443.4-$484.5] vs $388.4 [95% CI, $368.1-$408.7]; P < .001) but were lower for inpatient hospitalization fees ($201.6 [95% CI, $146.2-$228.7] vs $260.6 [95% CI, $220.2-$341.5]; P = .04). Telepsychiatry clinic patients had a 38.0% lower mean annualized hospitalization rate per 1000 patients than controls (274.3 [95% CI, 237.1-311.6] hospitalizations per 1000 patients vs 442.6 [95% CI, 396.5-488.7] hospitalizations per 1000 patients; P < .001) and a 17.9% lower rate of admissions from the emergency department (patients vs controls, 299.7 admissions [47.7%] vs 519.0 admissions [58.1%]).
In this cross-sectional study of 5372 patients, use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services was associated with decreases in inpatient hospitalization rates and lower rates of admissions from the emergency department, with similar costs to Medicaid. These findings suggest that outpatient telepsychiatry care could play an important role in reducing hospital admissions among patients enrolled in Medicaid.
在精神病学领域,可归因于适当且及时治疗的成本节约证据仍然很少。为医疗补助患者提供降低护理总成本的循证精神科护理干预措施极具挑战性。
调查与使用门诊远程精神病学诊所相关的医疗补助成本和护理结果。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究分析了2022年使用和未使用门诊远程精神病学诊所(蒙大拿州比林斯市的Frontier Psychiatry)服务的医疗补助患者。数据分析于2024年6月至9月进行。
通过门诊远程精神病学诊所接受护理。
评估了远程精神病学患者与对照组之间医疗补助成本及成本子类型的差异。还比较了包括住院治疗、再次住院和急诊科入院在内的质量指标。
共有2686名患者使用了门诊远程精神病学诊所的服务(1665名女性[62.0%];平均[标准差]年龄为30.55[14.67]岁)以及2686名倾向匹配的对照组患者(1665名女性[62.0%];平均[标准差]年龄为31.37[15.92]岁)。在研究期间,在所检查的各类别中,远程精神病学患者的每月每位成员护理成本(PMPM)与倾向匹配的对照组患者相似(分别为685.5美元[置信区间95%,632.9 - 738.2美元]和734.0美元[置信区间95%,645.7 - 822.3美元];P = 0.10)。远程精神病学诊所患者的医疗补助PMPM专业服务成本高于对照组患者(分别为464.0美元[置信区间95%,443.4 - 484.5美元]和388.4美元[置信区间95%,368.1 - 408.7美元];P < 0.001),但住院治疗费较低(分别为201.6美元[置信区间95%,146.2 - 228.7美元]和260.6美元[置信区间95%,220.2 - 341.5美元];P = 0.04)。远程精神病学诊所患者每1000名患者的年均住院率比对照组低38.0%(每1000名患者中分别为274.3次住院[置信区间95%,237.——311——6]和442.6次住院[置信区间95%,396.5 - 488.7];P < 0.001),且急诊科入院率低17.9%(患者与对照组分别为299.7次入院[47.7%]和519.0次入院[58.1%])。
在这项对5372名患者的横断面研究中,使用门诊远程精神病学诊所服务与住院率降低和急诊科入院率降低相关,且医疗补助成本相似。这些发现表明,门诊远程精神病学护理在减少医疗补助参保患者的住院方面可能发挥重要作用。