LFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance. Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Science-INEF. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Sports, UCAM, Catholic University San Antonio, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041285.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study all published clinical trial interventions, determined the magnitude of whole-body hypertrophy in humans (healthy males) and observed the individual responsibility of each variable in muscle growth after resistance training (RT). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception until 10 May 2018 for original articles assessing the effects of RT on muscle size after interventions of more than 2 weeks of duration. Specifically, we obtain the variables fat-free mass (FMM), lean muscle mass (LMM) and skeletal muscle mass (SMM). The effects on outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MD) and a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regressions determined covariates (age, weight, height, durations in weeks…) to explore the moderate effect related to the participants and characteristics of training. One hundred and eleven studies (158 groups, 1927 participants) reported on the effects of RT for muscle mass. RT significantly increased muscle mass (FFM+LMM+SMM; Δ1.53 kg; 95% CI [1.30, 1.76], < 0.001; I = 0%, = 1.00). Considering the overall effects of the meta-regression, and taking into account the participants' characteristics, none of the studied covariates explained any effect on changes in muscle mass. Regarding the training characteristics, the only significant variable that explained the variance of the hypertrophy was the sets per workout, showing a significant negative interaction (MD; estimate: 1.85, 95% CI [1.45, 2.25], < 0.001; moderator: -0.03 95% CI [-0.05, -0.001] = 0.04). In conclusion, RT has a significant effect on the improvement of hypertrophy (~1.5 kg). The excessive sets per workout affects negatively the muscle mass gain.
我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,研究了所有已发表的临床试验干预措施,确定了人体(健康男性)全身肥大的程度,并观察了抗阻训练(RT)后肌肉生长中每个变量的个体责任。从数据库建立到 2018 年 5 月 10 日,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 中对评估 RT 对持续时间超过 2 周的干预后肌肉大小影响的原始文章进行了检索。具体来说,我们获得了去脂体重(FFM)、瘦体重(LMM)和骨骼肌质量(SMM)等变量。结果以均值差(MD)表示,采用随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归确定协变量(年龄、体重、身高、周数等),以探讨与参与者和训练特征相关的中度影响。有 111 项研究(158 组,1927 名参与者)报告了 RT 对肌肉质量的影响。RT 显著增加肌肉质量(FFM+LMM+SMM;Δ1.53kg;95%CI[1.30,1.76],<0.001;I=0%,=1.00)。考虑到荟萃回归的整体效果,并考虑到参与者的特征,没有一个研究协变量可以解释肌肉质量变化的任何影响。关于训练特征,唯一能解释肥大变异的显著变量是每组锻炼的次数,显示出显著的负交互作用(MD;估计值:1.85;95%CI[1.45,2.25];<0.001;调节因素:-0.03;95%CI[-0.05,-0.001];=0.04)。总之,RT 对改善肥大有显著效果(~1.5kg)。每组锻炼的次数过多会对肌肉质量的增加产生负面影响。