A network approach to addressing the needs of patients with incurable head and neck cancer and their families.

BACKGROUND

Patients with incurable head and neck cancer have considerable unmet needs and complex symptom burden, with evidence of substantial geographical and/or socioeconomic inequalities. Accurate information on healthcare needs, resource utilisation and service provision in the last year of life is lacking. This places limits on service delivery planning and the development and testing of interventions to better meet needs. Our partnership spans three regions, which nationally have some of the highest rates of incurable head and neck cancer.

AIMS

The overall aims were to (1) establish a palliative head and neck cancer partnership, (2) identify and evaluate routine incurable head and neck cancer data sources and utilise these to develop and address research priorities.

OBJECTIVES

O1. Develop a palliative head and neck cancer network within the North of England, representing a geographical area with high incidence of incurable head and neck cancer and palliative care needs. O2. Develop and refine research questions and priorities. O3. Engage with data providers to identify relevant data sets and specific data fields to understand the potential quality and utility of these to inform research priorities.

METHODS

There were three interconnected work packages: WP1: A 'snowballing' approach to establish a network of clinicians, researchers, patient and public representatives, data architects and key stakeholders with an interest in head and neck cancer palliative care. WP2: A Delphi consensus process to develop and refine research questions and priorities, based on national guidance and systematic reviews of evidence gaps. WP3: Identification of national and local data sets and exploration of the potential data quality and utility, and associated information governance processes for access.

RESULTS

WP1: A diverse network was established, encompassing members from a wide range of professions and patient/carer groups. WP2: The Delphi consisted of two rounds involving up to 66 participants. Consensus was reached on 12 research questions representing 4 key areas of prioritisation: service provision, symptom management, psychosocial support and information provision and communication. WP3: A range of national and local data sources were identified as having the potential to address the research priorities. A directory of data sources was developed. Working in an iterative way, data sets and relevant data fields were mapped to the 12 potential research priority areas to assess the applicability of using routine data to address these priorities.

LIMITATIONS

Approximately, one-third of participants in the Delphi process dropped out in round 2. Despite attempts to be flexible in our approach, retaining participants, particularly for patients and their families on a palliative care pathway, is challenging.

FUTURE WORK

The established network and consensus exercise form the basis for future service evaluations and collaborative research. These will be based on gaps and priorities agreed by patients, their families and a range of other stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

The network has established a cross-sectoral collaboration for improving incurable head and neck cancer and a platform to identify 12 research priority areas. Utilising routine data to address these priorities remains a challenging area, and a range of methodological research approaches will be required to take this forward.

FUNDING

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR135361.