Leighton Hollie J, Hibbert Tegan M, Ritchie Grace I, Neill Daniel R, Fothergill Joanne L
Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool.
Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool;
J Vis Exp. 2025 Apr 18(218). doi: 10.3791/67477.
Standard pre-clinical testing methods for novel antimicrobial therapeutics used to treat chronic lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis do not reflect the environmental conditions of the hostile lung niche. Current reductionist testing conditions can lead to the progression of compounds along a preclinical pipeline without evidence of their activity under cystic fibrosis lung niche-appropriate conditions. Several approaches used to study traditional antimicrobials may not be suitable for antibiotic alternatives, including anti-virulence therapeutics like anti-quorum sensing agents and siderophore inhibitors. This protocol documents an aggregate biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to compare resistance and infection-relevant gene expression in single-species and multi-species cultures (Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans), examining colony-forming unit (CFU) reductions and changes in gene expression, using algD as an exemplar. The model was optimized for small, static volumes of bacterial cultures to allow the study of novel compounds in the discovery phase of the drug development pipeline, where compound quantities may be limited. Single-species P. aeruginosa biofilms were formed in Synthetic Cystic Fibrosis Medium 2 (SCFM2) for 24 h before treatment with meropenem at different concentrations (1, 16, and 256 µg/mL) for a further 24 h. Polymicrobial biofilms were established by growing Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans together in SCFM2, then inoculating with P. aeruginosa for an additional 24 h and treating with meropenem. The lack of a direct connection between compound efficacy measures in pre-clinical testing and clinical trial results has cast doubt on the applicability of current laboratory screening tools. This model allows us to understand the impact of relevant factors on P. aeruginosa gene expression, including genes contributing to resistance and virulence, thereby bridging this gap.
用于治疗囊性纤维化患者慢性肺部感染的新型抗菌疗法的标准临床前测试方法无法反映肺部恶劣生态位的环境条件。当前的简化测试条件可能会导致化合物在临床前研发流程中推进,而没有证据表明它们在适合囊性纤维化肺部生态位的条件下具有活性。一些用于研究传统抗菌药物的方法可能不适用于抗生素替代品,包括抗群体感应剂和铁载体抑制剂等抗毒力疗法。本方案记录了一种铜绿假单胞菌的聚集生物膜模型,用于比较单物种和多物种培养物(金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌)中的耐药性和与感染相关的基因表达,以algD为例,检测菌落形成单位(CFU)的减少和基因表达的变化。该模型针对小体积静态细菌培养进行了优化,以便在药物研发流程的发现阶段研究新型化合物,因为此时化合物数量可能有限。单物种铜绿假单胞菌生物膜在合成囊性纤维化培养基2(SCFM2)中形成24小时,然后用不同浓度(1、16和256μg/mL)的美罗培南处理24小时。通过在SCFM2中共同培养金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌,然后接种铜绿假单胞菌再培养24小时并使用美罗培南处理,建立多微生物生物膜。临床前测试中的化合物疗效测量与临床试验结果之间缺乏直接联系,这使得人们对当前实验室筛选工具的适用性产生了怀疑。该模型使我们能够了解相关因素对铜绿假单胞菌基因表达的影响,包括与耐药性和毒力相关的基因,从而弥合这一差距。