Almeida Gustavo, Ortiz Alexis, González Jaime, Winchester Jason B, Ortiz Jovannah, Hoppe Nicole, Calderón David
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Allen College-UnityPoint Health, Waterloo, IA, USA.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2025 Jun;42:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.11.030. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training during strength training has been shown to lead to several physical improvements. However, its use during aerobic exercise has yet to be fully documented. This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) on balance, knee stability, quadriceps strength, and submaximal VO2 after cycling training.
Fifty-two healthy adults (58% women) were randomly assigned to a control group without BFR (CON) and four BFR groups: 60% occlusion in one (60UNIL) or both legs (60BILAT) and 80% occlusion in one (80UNIL) or both legs (80BILAT). Single-leg balance with eyes open and closed, knee stability (i.e., dynamic knee valgus) during a step-down, isokinetic quadriceps strength at 60°, 180°, and 300°/second, and submaximal VO2 were assessed at baseline, and three- and six-week follow-up. All participants performed cycling training thrice weekly for six weeks, pedaling at 70 revolutions/minute for 15 min. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed for each outcome measure.
Quadriceps strength at 180°/second showed statistically significant changes across time for all groups. Quadriceps strength at 300°/second showed statistically significant differences across time for the 60% occlusion groups. However, only the 60UNIL showed statistically significant changes in quadriceps strength at three weeks.
BFR during cycling does not seem to improve balance, knee stability, quadriceps strength at 60°/second, or submaximal VO2. Unilateral BFR with 60% occlusion improved quadriceps strength and endurance three weeks after cycling.
力量训练期间的血流限制(BFR)训练已被证明能带来多项身体机能的改善。然而,其在有氧运动中的应用尚未得到充分记录。这项随机对照试验评估了血流限制(BFR)对骑行训练后平衡能力、膝关节稳定性、股四头肌力量和次最大摄氧量的影响。
52名健康成年人(58%为女性)被随机分为无BFR的对照组(CON)和四个BFR组:单腿60%闭塞(60UNIL)或双腿60%闭塞(60BILAT)以及单腿80%闭塞(80UNIL)或双腿80%闭塞(80BILAT)。在基线、3周和6周随访时评估睁眼和闭眼单腿平衡、下台阶时的膝关节稳定性(即动态膝外翻)、60°、180°和300°/秒的等速股四头肌力量以及次最大摄氧量。所有参与者每周进行三次骑行训练,持续六周,以每分钟70转的速度蹬踏15分钟。对每个结果指标进行重复测量方差分析。
所有组在180°/秒时的股四头肌力量随时间有统计学显著变化。300°/秒时的股四头肌力量在60%闭塞组随时间有统计学显著差异。然而,只有60UNIL组在3周时股四头肌力量有统计学显著变化。
骑行过程中的BFR似乎并不能改善平衡能力、膝关节稳定性、60°/秒时的股四头肌力量或次最大摄氧量。6周骑行训练后,60%闭塞的单侧BFR可在3周后改善股四头肌力量和耐力。