Suppr超能文献

早泄患者药物治疗的疗效与安全性:随机对照试验荟萃分析的伞形综述

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments in patients with premature ejaculation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Raisi Firoozeh, Soleimani Robabeh, Ahmadzadeh Azin, Sadati Seyedeh Nasibeh, Fakhrian Arghavan, Jalali Mir Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 13337-15914, Iran.

Kavosh Cognitive Behavior Sciences and Addiction Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht 41936-55599, Iran.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2025 Jun 3;22(6):1014-1023. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf094.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common male sexual dysfunction characterized by short ejaculatory latency with minimal stimulation, an inability to delay or control ejaculation, and distress or dissatisfaction due to the condition. Pharmacological therapy is central to PE management, with dapoxetine as the only approved selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Off-label options, including long-acting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (eg, paroxetine), topical anesthetics, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (eg, sildenafil), and tramadol, have also been explored. Despite numerous systematic reviews on its treatment, challenges remain due to methodological heterogeneity, variability in outcome measures, and inconsistencies in trial quality, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions.

OBJECTIVES

This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the efficacy of pharmacological treatments in prolonging intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and their safety by analyzing associated adverse events in adults with PE.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of SR-MAs ranging from 1990 to 2024 was performed. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed quality of previous SR-MAs using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews version 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and the risk of bias of RCTs using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcome of interest was IELT. Effect sizes from primary studies of all SR-MAs were extracted, and after removing overlapping RCTs, a re-meta-analysis was conducted. We appraised evidence certainty using the Grading of recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scoring system (GRADE).

RESULTS

This review included 44 SR-MAs covering 65 RCTs. Only two SR-MAs rated as moderate to high quality in the AMSTAR-2 assessment. Additionally, only six out of 65 RCTs had a low risk of bias. The median follow-up for included RCTs was 7.9 months. These treatments significantly improved IELT compared to placebo, with paroxetine achieving the largest mean difference (5.64 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.50 to 9.07). However, all pharmacological treatments were associated with adverse events, with paroxetine having the lowest risk (RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.3), while risk ratios were higher for other treatments, including 4.1 for topical anesthetics, 2.4 for tramadol, and 1.8 for dapoxetine. Only topical anesthetics and paroxetine demonstrated a moderate to high rating in the GRADE assessment.

CONCLUSION

Topical anesthetics, tramadol, and SSRIs significantly increase IELT. However, substantial heterogeneity among meta-analyses may limit the robustness of these findings. Future RCTs should include extended follow-up periods to better assess the long-term efficacy and safety of these treatments.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD 42024561480.

摘要

引言

早泄(PE)是一种常见的男性性功能障碍,其特征是在极少刺激下射精潜伏期短、无法延迟或控制射精,以及因该病症而产生的痛苦或不满。药物治疗是早泄管理的核心,达泊西汀是唯一获批的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)。也已探索了其他非适应证用药选择,包括长效选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)(如帕罗西汀)、局部麻醉剂、5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂(如西地那非)和曲马多。尽管对其治疗进行了大量系统评价,但由于方法学异质性、结局测量的变异性以及试验质量的不一致性,仍然存在挑战,难以得出可靠的结论。

目的

本项对随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析(SR-MAs)的汇总评价,通过分析成年早泄患者相关不良事件,研究了药物治疗在延长阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)方面的疗效及其安全性。

方法

对1990年至2024年的SR-MAs进行全面检索。两名评价者独立筛选文章、提取数据,并使用“系统评价2版测量工具”(AMSTAR-2)评估先前SR-MAs的质量,使用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具评估RCT的偏倚风险。主要关注的结局是IELT。提取所有SR-MAs的原始研究的效应量,在去除重叠的RCT后,进行重新荟萃分析。我们使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价评分系统(GRADE)评估证据确定性。

结果

本评价纳入了44项SR-MAs,涵盖65项RCT。在AMSTAR-2评估中,只有两项SR-MAs被评为中等至高质量。此外,65项RCT中只有6项偏倚风险较低。纳入的RCT的中位随访时间为7.9个月。与安慰剂相比,这些治疗显著改善了IELT,帕罗西汀的平均差异最大(5.64分钟;95%置信区间[CI]:3.50至9.07)。然而,所有药物治疗均与不良事件相关,帕罗西汀的风险最低(RR:1.5;95%CI:0.3至7.3),而其他治疗的风险比更高,包括局部麻醉剂为4.1、曲马多为2.4、达泊西汀为1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验