Kratina Sarah, Strike Carol, Schwartz Robert, Nayfeh Ayah, Jopling Sydney, Lo Chris, Rush Brian
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0318343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318343. eCollection 2025.
Psychedelic substances are increasingly recognized for their therapeutic potential to ease psychological suffering linked to end-of-life issues. However, amid renewed scientific and public interest, policy remains restrictive. Existing reviews have made progress in synthesizing the results of studies of psychedelic interventions, especially psilocybin, and particularly with regard to their outcomes related to anxiety and depression, long-term effects and safety. Despite this progress, a wide range of both substances (such as ayahuasca, psilocybin, ketamine) and therapeutic approaches (such as psychedelics alone, or psychotherapy assisted with a psychedelic) in the use of psychedelic interventions specifically for end-of-life populations, has not been adequately covered by reviews to date. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and learn from the variety of psychedelic substances and therapeutic approaches that exists within the research on therapeutic psychedelic interventions reported in populations coping with psychological suffering associated with life-threatening illness and the end of life itself. We will follow Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework for scoping reviews while incorporating updated methodological guidance. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline will be used to organize the search and identification of research focusing on psychedelic interventions, psychological suffering, and end-of-life issues. Health science databases such as Medline, Embase, APA PsychINFO, and CINAHL will be searched. The search will be limited to empirical published data on 'end-of-life', 'psychedelics', and 'psychological suffering'. Data extracted from selected studies will cover intervention details, participant characteristics, measured outcomes, and theorised mechanisms. The insights gained from this review will be used to inform future research and discussions on how psychedelics can be integrated into care strategies for populations coping with end-of-life concerns. This scoping review does not require ethics approval.
迷幻物质因其缓解与临终问题相关的心理痛苦的治疗潜力而日益受到认可。然而,在科学和公众兴趣重新燃起的背景下,政策仍然具有限制性。现有的综述在综合迷幻干预研究结果方面取得了进展,尤其是裸盖菇素,特别是在其与焦虑和抑郁相关的结果、长期影响和安全性方面。尽管取得了这一进展,但迄今为止,综述尚未充分涵盖专门针对临终人群使用迷幻干预时的多种物质(如死藤水、裸盖菇素、氯胺酮)和治疗方法(如单独使用迷幻剂,或在迷幻剂辅助下进行心理治疗)。本范围综述的目的是识别并借鉴在应对与危及生命的疾病和生命终结本身相关的心理痛苦的人群中所报告的治疗性迷幻干预研究中存在的各种迷幻物质和治疗方法。我们将遵循阿克西和奥马利(2005年)的范围综述框架,同时纳入更新的方法学指导。范围综述的系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)指南将用于组织对专注于迷幻干预、心理痛苦和临终问题的研究的搜索和识别。将搜索医学文献数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库(APA PsychINFO)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)等健康科学数据库。搜索将限于关于“临终”、“迷幻剂”和“心理痛苦”的实证发表数据。从选定研究中提取的数据将涵盖干预细节、参与者特征、测量结果和理论机制。本次综述获得的见解将用于为未来关于如何将迷幻剂纳入应对临终问题人群的护理策略的研究和讨论提供信息。本范围综述无需伦理批准。