Suppr超能文献

对法医叙述进行主题分析,以了解社会空间背景、近期吸毒情况以及兴奋剂中毒死亡的可能机制。

Thematic analysis of medical examiner narratives to understand the socio-spatial context, recency of drug use, and likely mechanism of stimulant toxicity deaths.

作者信息

Black Finn, McMahan Vanessa M, Chang Yi-Shin G, Rodda Luke N, Coffin Phillip O

机构信息

San Francisco Department of Public Health, 25 Van Ness Avenue Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94102, United States.

San Francisco Department of Public Health, 25 Van Ness Avenue Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94102, United States.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Jul 1;272:112700. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112700. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug toxicity as a cause of death is challenging to establish and may be based on limited evidence, especially in deaths attributed to stimulants. We developed a method for characterizing stimulant deaths, focusing on potential mechanisms and opportunities for intervention.

METHODS

We used medical examiner case narratives and medical records from a mixed methods study of fatal acute stimulant toxicity in San Francisco. We coded case narratives for circumstances surrounding death events, including physical location, bystander presence, decedent disposition, and evidence of recent street drug use; medical records provided data on potential mechanism of death when not present in case narratives.

RESULTS

Of 101 deaths (70 stimulants-no-opioids, 31 stimulants-fentanyl), 85 were unwitnessed, including 69 unwitnessed deaths in spaces inaccessible to bystanders. Drug use was observed before collapse in 1 of 14 witnessed stimulant-no-opioid and 1 of 2 witnessed stimulant-fentanyl deaths. Among unwitnessed events, scene evidence of drug use was found in 36 of 56 stimulant-no-opioid and 25 of 29 stimulant-fentanyl deaths. Twelve of 14 witnessed stimulant-no-opioid deaths and none of two witnessed stimulant-fentanyl deaths included an apparent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Deaths occurred in physically and socially isolated contexts, limiting opportunities for bystander intervention. Compared to stimulant-fentanyl deaths, stimulant-no-opioid deaths may be more likely to be witnessed and involve a cardiovascular event, and less likely to involve recent drug use. Applying a thematic analysis of medical examiner records to a larger sample, including other opioid deaths, could guide prevention strategies.

摘要

背景

药物毒性作为一种死因很难确定,可能基于有限的证据,尤其是在归因于兴奋剂的死亡案例中。我们开发了一种描述兴奋剂致死情况的方法,重点关注潜在机制和干预机会。

方法

我们使用了来自旧金山一项关于致命急性兴奋剂毒性的混合方法研究中的法医案例叙述和医疗记录。我们对案例叙述中围绕死亡事件的情况进行编码,包括物理位置、旁观者在场情况、死者处置方式以及近期街头吸毒的证据;当案例叙述中没有提供时,医疗记录提供了关于潜在死亡机制的数据。

结果

在101例死亡案例中(70例为仅使用兴奋剂,31例为使用兴奋剂且同时使用芬太尼),85例死亡无人目睹,其中69例在旁观者无法进入的空间内发生。在14例有目击者的仅使用兴奋剂案例中有1例以及2例有目击者的使用兴奋剂且同时使用芬太尼案例中有1例在倒地前被观察到吸毒。在无人目睹的事件中,56例仅使用兴奋剂案例中有36例以及29例使用兴奋剂且同时使用芬太尼案例中有25例发现了吸毒的现场证据。14例有目击者的仅使用兴奋剂案例中有12例死亡以及2例有目击者的使用兴奋剂且同时使用芬太尼案例中无一例包括明显的心血管或脑血管事件。

结论

死亡发生在身体和社会孤立的环境中,限制了旁观者干预的机会。与使用兴奋剂且同时使用芬太尼的死亡案例相比,仅使用兴奋剂的死亡案例可能更有可能被目睹且涉及心血管事件,并且近期吸毒的可能性较小。将法医记录的主题分析应用于更大的样本,包括其他阿片类药物死亡案例,可能会指导预防策略。

相似文献

7
Cross-sectional cause of death comparisons for stimulant and opioid mortality in San Francisco, 2005-2015.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Accidental drug deaths in Fulton County, Georgia, 2002: characteristics, case management and certification issues.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008 Sep;29(3):224-30. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e31817efae1.
10
Trends, characteristics, and circumstances surrounding stimulant toxicity deaths in Ontario, Canada from 2018 to 2021.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Mar;170:209614. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209614. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug involvement variations in overdose death spikes: county-level analysis in Massachusetts.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 13;3(2):e002293. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002293. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

3
Methamphetamine-Related Mortality in the United States: Co-Involvement of Heroin and Fentanyl, 1999-2021.
Am J Public Health. 2023 Apr;113(4):416-419. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307212. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
A Chronic Condition Disguised as an Acute Event: the Case for Re-thinking Stimulant Overdose Death.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3462-3464. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07692-1. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Serious Illness and Limitations of Death Certificate-Based Data: Urgent Lessons From the Opioid Epidemic.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(S1):S36-S38. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306409.
7
Characterizing stimulant overdose: A qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of "overamping".
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Apr;102:103592. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103592. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
"It's called overamping": experiences of overdose among people who use methamphetamine.
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Jan 16;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00588-7.
10
The rise of illicit fentanyls, stimulants and the fourth wave of the opioid overdose crisis.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;34(4):344-350. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000717.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验